public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111970] [14 regression] SLP for non-IFN gathers result in RISC-V test failure on gather since r14-4745-gbeab5b95c58145 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:20:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-111970-4-rAR8WoFAzw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-111970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- OK, so for RISC-V with the testcase from the description there's the following issue: _179 = &MEM <vector(64) unsigned char> [(uint8_t *)_618]; _225 = BIT_FIELD_REF <MEM <vector(64) unsigned char> [(uint8_t *)_179], 8, 16>; ... vect__8.9_405 = {_218, _224, _230, _236, _242, _248, _254, _260, _266, _272, _278, _284, _290, _296, _302, _308, _314, _320, _326, _332, _338, _344, _350, _356, _362, _368, _374, _380, _386, _392, _398, _404}; vect__11.11_599 = vect__8.9_405 + { 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 2.0e+0 }; _609 = (void *) ivtmp.31_622; MEM <vector(32) float> [(float *)_609] = vect__11.11_599; _1 = _609 + 128; MEM <vector(32) float> [(float *)_1] = vect__11.11_599; I think the following fixes it: diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc index 96e4a6cffad..bf8c99779ae 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc @@ -9188,7 +9188,8 @@ vectorizable_store (vec_info *vinfo, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT factor = const_offset_nunits / const_nunits; vec_offset = vec_offsets[(vec_num * j + i) / factor]; - unsigned elt_offset = (j % factor) * const_nunits; + unsigned elt_offset + = ((vec_num * j + i) % factor) * const_nunits; tree idx_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (vec_offset)); tree scale = size_int (gs_info.scale); align = get_object_alignment (DR_REF (first_dr_info->dr)); @@ -11150,7 +11151,8 @@ vectorizable_load (vec_info *vinfo, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT factor = const_offset_nunits / const_nunits; vec_offset = vec_offsets[(vec_num * j + i) / factor]; - unsigned elt_offset = (j % factor) * const_nunits; + unsigned elt_offset + = ((vec_num * j + i) % factor) * const_nunits; tree idx_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (vec_offset)); tree scale = size_int (gs_info.scale); align = get_object_alignment (DR_REF (first_dr_info->dr));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 14:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-25 2:02 [Bug c/111970] New: [tree-optimization] SLP for non-IFN gathers result in RISC-V test failure on gather pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-25 2:03 ` [Bug c/111970] " pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-25 2:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/111970] [14 regression] SLP for non-IFN gathers result in RISC-V test failure on gather since r14-4745-gbeab5b95c58145 pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-25 8:05 ` pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-27 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-27 13:03 ` pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-31 12:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 14:07 ` pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-10-31 14:16 ` pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-11-13 12:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-13 22:07 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-11-20 6:49 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-11-20 6:51 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-11-20 6:52 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-11-20 8:10 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-11-20 8:22 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-11-20 8:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-20 14:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-11-20 14:58 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-20 22:24 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-20 22:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-20 23:56 ` pan2.li at intel dot com 2023-11-21 7:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-21 7:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-111970-4-rAR8WoFAzw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).