* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-16 10:20 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-16 12:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-16 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-16 10:20 ` [Bug sanitizer/112563] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-16 12:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-19 21:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-16 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords| |build
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-16 10:20 ` [Bug sanitizer/112563] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-16 12:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-19 21:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-19 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, what is the Solaris/sparc native as syntax for something similar?
Strangely, non-weak aliases in config/sparc/sysv4.h use the x = y syntax
rather than .set x, y that is used on most targets.
Would using
extern "C" void *memcpy (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
extern "C" void *memmove (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
extern "C" void *memset (void *, int, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
extern "C" void *__builtin_memcpy (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0))
__asm ("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
extern "C" void *__builtin_memmove (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0))
__asm ("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
extern "C" void *__builtin_memset (void *, int, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
instead work there?
At least on x86_64-linux, I get the same effects when using e.g.
void
foo (void *r, void *s, void *t, void *u)
{
memcpy (r, s, 512);
__builtin_memcpy (t, u, 512);
}
with -O2 -mstringop-strategy=libcall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-19 21:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-20 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 13:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-20 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note, following patch
--- libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h.jj
2023-11-15 17:19:11.512783752 +0100
+++ libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h 2023-11-19
22:52:14.659301189 +0100
@@ -17,9 +17,24 @@
// The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
# if !defined(_WIN32)
+# if !defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__)
asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
asm("memset = __sanitizer_internal_memset");
+# else
+# if defined(__cplusplus)
+extern "C" {
+# endif
+extern void *(memcpy) (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
+extern void *(memmove) (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
+extern void *(memset) (void *, int, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
+extern void *__builtin_memcpy (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
+extern void *__builtin_memmove (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
+extern void *__builtin_memset (void *, int, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
+# if defined(__cplusplus)
+}
+# endif
+# endif
# if defined(__cplusplus) && \
!defined(SANITIZER_COMMON_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_IN_STD)
passed bootstrap/regtest for me on x86_64-linux and i686-linux and didn't
create any new memset/memcpy/memmove calls in objdump -dr libasan.so.* (we have
2 memset calls
from inside of libbacktrace, guess we ought to deal with that eventually).
Does this help on Solaris/sparc?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-20 13:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-11-20 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2023-11-20 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Note, following patch
[...]
> passed bootstrap/regtest for me on x86_64-linux and i686-linux and didn't
> create any new memset/memcpy/memmove calls in objdump -dr libasan.so.* (we have
> 2 memset calls
> from inside of libbacktrace, guess we ought to deal with that eventually).
> Does this help on Solaris/sparc?
It's almost there, but not quite: I've started with a Solaris/sparc
build of unpatched libsanitizer which uses gas. In that case,
libsanitizer.so contains
000fc594 <__asan_backtrace_dwarf_add>:
fd220: 40 00 9b f2 call 1241e8 <memcpy@plt>
000fd8dc <__asan_backtrace_create_state>:
fd91c: 40 00 9a 33 call 1241e8 <memcpy@plt>
0010b0b4 <elf_zstd_read_fse>:
10b384: 40 00 63 e7 call 124320 <memset@plt>
10b4a0: 40 00 63 a0 call 124320 <memset@plt>
With your patch and using as, there are a few more:
0005ab90 <__asan_register_globals.part.0>:
5afdc: 40 03 30 d2 call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
00091c94 <printf_common(void*, char const*, void*)>:
92134: 40 02 54 7c call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
926a8: 40 02 53 1f call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
000c4154 <__asan::ReportDeadlySignal(__sanitizer::SignalContext const&)>:
c4218: 40 01 8c 43 call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
000c76b0 <__asan::ReportODRViolation(__asan_global const*, unsigned int,
__asan_global const*, unsigned int)>:
c77a8: 40 01 7e df call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
c77b8: 40 01 7e db call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
000e2140 <__sanitizer::VSNPrintf(char*, int, char const*, void*)>:
e2554: 40 01 13 74 call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
e2610: 40 01 13 45 call 127324 <memcpy@plt>
gcc warns:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h:31:104:
warning: ‘asm’ declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename
[-Wpragmas]
31 | extern void *__builtin_memcpy (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__)
__asm ("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
|
^
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h:32:106:
warning: ‘asm’ declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename
[-Wpragmas]
32 | extern void *__builtin_memmove (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__)
__asm ("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
|
^
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h:33:95:
warning: ‘asm’ declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename
[-Wpragmas]
33 | extern void *__builtin_memset (void *, int, __SIZE_TYPE__) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
|
^
Though I don't see what previous rename that would be: compiling e.g
asan_globals.cpp with -g3 -save-temps shows no rename (that would be
#pragma redefine_extname, I guess) at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 13:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2023-11-20 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-20 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The __builtin_mem* redirections actually don't seem to be necessary (at least
for me on x86_64-linux), though I certainly don't see any messages about
ignoring something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-20 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 19:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, I see, the problem is that the sanitizers use (both in GCC and Clang)
-fno-builtin option, which makes it not work unless user uses just memcpy.
Short testcase:
extern "C" void *memcpy (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
extern "C" void *memmove (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memmove");
extern "C" void *memset (void *, int, decltype (sizeof 0)) __asm
("__sanitizer_internal_memset");
struct S { char s[512]; };
void
foo (S *p, S *q)
{
*p = *q;
}
void
bar (int, void *r, void *s)
{
memcpy (r, s, 512);
}
void
baz (int, int, void *t, void *u)
{
__builtin_memcpy (t, u, 512);
}
On x86_64 -O2 -mstringop-strategy=libcall vs. that + -fno-builtin, on sparc
without -mstringop-strategy=libcall.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-20 19:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-20 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-20 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe
extern "C" {
static void *memcpy (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0)) __attribute__
((weakref ("__sanitizer_internal_memcpy")));
static void *memmove (void *, const void *, decltype (sizeof 0))
__attribute__ ((weakref ("__sanitizer_internal_memmove")));
static void *memset (void *, int, decltype (sizeof 0)) __attribute__
((weakref ("__sanitizer_internal_memset")));
}
struct S { char s[512]; };
void
foo (S *p, S *q)
{
*p = *q;
}
void
bar (int, void *r, void *s)
{
memcpy (r, s, 512);
}
void
baz (int, int, void *t, void *u)
{
__builtin_memcpy (t, u, 512);
}
works instead.
But in any case, I'd use it only when what is in doesn't really work.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 19:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-20 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 17:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-20 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It doesn't work after the string.h declarations of those functions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-20 20:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-21 17:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-22 13:22 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-21 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, shall we go with
--- libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h.jj
2023-11-15 12:45:17.359586776 +0100
+++ libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h 2023-11-21
18:29:52.401817763 +0100
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
# define SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
// The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
-# if !defined(_WIN32)
+// It doesn't work when using Solaris as either.
+# if !defined(_WIN32) && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ using vector = Define_SANITIZER_COMMON_N
} // namespace std
# endif // __cpluplus
-# endif // !_WIN32
+# endif // !_WIN32 && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
# endif // SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
#endif // SANITIZER_COMMON_NO_REDEFINE_BUILTINS
then (either as local patch or try to push it upstream)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-21 17:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-22 13:22 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-11-22 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2023-11-22 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> So, shall we go with
> --- libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h.jj
> 2023-11-15 12:45:17.359586776 +0100
> +++ libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h 2023-11-21
> 18:29:52.401817763 +0100
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
> # define SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
>
> // The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
> -# if !defined(_WIN32)
> +// It doesn't work when using Solaris as either.
> +# if !defined(_WIN32) && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
>
> asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
> asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
> @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ using vector = Define_SANITIZER_COMMON_N
> } // namespace std
>
> # endif // __cpluplus
> -# endif // !_WIN32
> +# endif // !_WIN32 && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
>
> # endif // SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
> #endif // SANITIZER_COMMON_NO_REDEFINE_BUILTINS
>
> then (either as local patch or try to push it upstream)?
That's way to heavy IMO: it punishes the Solaris/x86 as which isn't
affected and also Solaris/SPARC with gas.
I've now come up with an alternative. It's a bit ugly, but it gets the
work done:
diff --git a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
+++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
@@ -17,6 +17,17 @@
// The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
# if !defined(_WIN32)
+// FIXME: Explain.
+# if defined(__sparc__)
+# define ASM_MEM_DEF(FUNC) \
+ __asm__(".global " #FUNC "\n" \
+ ".type " #FUNC ",function\n" \
+ ".weak " #FUNC "\n" \
+ #FUNC ":\n");
+ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memcpy)
+ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memmove)
+ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memset)
+# endif
asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
asm("memset = __sanitizer_internal_memset");
I've run libsanitizer builds on sparc without this patch (gas only since
as fails) and with it (as and gas). It fixes the as build failure and
leaves the same number of calls to mem* functions in libasan.so as an
unpatched tree with gas.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-22 13:22 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2023-11-22 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-22 13:37 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-22 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #9)
> > --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > So, shall we go with
> > --- libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h.jj
> > 2023-11-15 12:45:17.359586776 +0100
> > +++ libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h 2023-11-21
> > 18:29:52.401817763 +0100
> > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
> > # define SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
> >
> > // The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
> > -# if !defined(_WIN32)
> > +// It doesn't work when using Solaris as either.
> > +# if !defined(_WIN32) && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
> >
> > asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
> > asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
> > @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ using vector = Define_SANITIZER_COMMON_N
> > } // namespace std
> >
> > # endif // __cpluplus
> > -# endif // !_WIN32
> > +# endif // !_WIN32 && !SANITIZER_SOLARIS
> >
> > # endif // SANITIZER_REDEFINE_BUILTINS_H
> > #endif // SANITIZER_COMMON_NO_REDEFINE_BUILTINS
> >
> > then (either as local patch or try to push it upstream)?
>
> That's way to heavy IMO: it punishes the Solaris/x86 as which isn't
> affected and also Solaris/SPARC with gas.
>
> I've now come up with an alternative. It's a bit ugly, but it gets the
> work done:
>
> diff --git a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
> b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
> --- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
> +++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,17 @@
> // The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
> # if !defined(_WIN32)
>
> +// FIXME: Explain.
> +# if defined(__sparc__)
> +# define ASM_MEM_DEF(FUNC) \
> + __asm__(".global " #FUNC "\n" \
> + ".type " #FUNC ",function\n" \
Not @function ?
> + ".weak " #FUNC "\n" \
> + #FUNC ":\n");
> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memcpy)
> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memmove)
> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memset)
> +# endif
> asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
> asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
> asm("memset = __sanitizer_internal_memset");
>
> I've run libsanitizer builds on sparc without this patch (gas only since
> as fails) and with it (as and gas). It fixes the as build failure and
> leaves the same number of calls to mem* functions in libasan.so as an
> unpatched tree with gas.
If it works, nice. Can you file it on github.com/llvm/llvm-project as an issue
and see if upstream is willing to accept it? I think they'll want some
indentation changes (if defined(__sparc__) is below the _WIN32 #if, so they
probably want it
indented more and the define even more. And dunno if defined(__sparc__) or
SANITIZER_SPARC should be used.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-22 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-22 13:37 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-11-27 10:41 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2023-11-22 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #9)
[...]
>> I've now come up with an alternative. It's a bit ugly, but it gets the
>> work done:
>>
>> diff --git a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
>> b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
>> --- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
>> +++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,17 @@
>> // The asm hack only works with GCC and Clang.
>> # if !defined(_WIN32)
>>
>> +// FIXME: Explain.
>> +# if defined(__sparc__)
>> +# define ASM_MEM_DEF(FUNC) \
>> + __asm__(".global " #FUNC "\n" \
>> + ".type " #FUNC ",function\n" \
>
> Not @function ?
No, this should be #function: that's the only variant sparc as
understands, and gas does for compatibility.
>> + ".weak " #FUNC "\n" \
>> + #FUNC ":\n");
>> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memcpy)
>> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memmove)
>> +ASM_MEM_DEF(__sanitizer_internal_memset)
>> +# endif
>> asm("memcpy = __sanitizer_internal_memcpy");
>> asm("memmove = __sanitizer_internal_memmove");
>> asm("memset = __sanitizer_internal_memset");
>>
>> I've run libsanitizer builds on sparc without this patch (gas only since
>> as fails) and with it (as and gas). It fixes the as build failure and
>> leaves the same number of calls to mem* functions in libasan.so as an
>> unpatched tree with gas.
>
> If it works, nice. Can you file it on github.com/llvm/llvm-project as an issue
> and see if upstream is willing to accept it? I think they'll want some
Can do, either as an issue or directly as a pull request. I'll run it
through a full llvm build, too, first.
> indentation changes (if defined(__sparc__) is below the _WIN32 #if, so they
> probably want it
> indented more and the define even more. And dunno if defined(__sparc__) or
> SANITIZER_SPARC should be used.
I know: LLVM has clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py to handle
this. I usually run my patches through that first, unlike it messes up
the existing formatting as was the case for pull request #72973.
The patches also needs an explanatory comment; this was just a proof of
concept. It might be even better to restrict the hack to __sparc__ &&
__sun__ && __svr4__ to avoid interfering with Linux/sparc64.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-22 13:37 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2023-11-27 10:41 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-11-27 12:57 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2023-11-27 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
> Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #9)
[...]
>> If it works, nice. Can you file it on github.com/llvm/llvm-project as an issue
>> and see if upstream is willing to accept it? I think they'll want some
>
> Can do, either as an issue or directly as a pull request. I'll run it
> through a full llvm build, too, first.
Unfortunately, this didn't work out at all. Initially, I had only
rebuilt libsanitizer with the patch, checking that there were only the
exepected number of calls to mem* functions in libasan.so.
The LLVM build on Solaris/sparcv9, while successful, doesn't tell you
much, unfortunately: due to a clang bug on sparc, the asan tests are
never run there.
When I ran a full Solaris/SPARC bootstrap, all asan tests FAILed with
AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: asan_rtl.cpp:397 "((!AsanInitIsRunning() &&
"ASan init calls itself!")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=1)
I've once had the misfortune of debugging such a initializion order
issue in LLVM, and that was an long and painful experience which I'd
rather not repeat here. The fix found in that case (build both
libasan.so and all asan tests with -z now) didn't work here, either:
this just turned the assertion failures into SEGVs.
This reliance on init order is a total nightmare: the details are
completely platform-specific and not portable at all.
Given all this, I've instead developed a patch that checks for assembler
a = b support in the libsanitizer configury and uses the result in
sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h. This way, only the one configuration
that has an issue here is punished. However, this has to stay local to
libsanitizer for obvious reasons.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-27 10:41 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2023-11-27 12:57 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-28 13:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-27 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2023-Novembe
| |r/638268.html
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-27 12:57 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-28 13:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-28 13:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-28 15:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-28 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth <ro@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:088d3cbc5f906444a7dee98bc9a6f4b724ddfc21
commit r14-5927-g088d3cbc5f906444a7dee98bc9a6f4b724ddfc21
Author: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: Tue Nov 28 14:54:34 2023 +0100
libsanitizer: Check assembler support for symbol assignment [PR112563]
The recent libsanitizer import broke the build on Solaris/SPARC with the
native as:
/usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
"__sanitizer_internal_memset" is used but not defined
/usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
"__sanitizer_internal_memcpy" is used but not defined
/usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
"__sanitizer_internal_memmove" is used but not defined
Since none of the alternatives considered in the PR worked out, this
patch checks if the assembler does support symbol assignment, disabling
the code otherwise. This returns the code to the way it was up to LLVM 16.
Bootstrapped without regressions on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (as and gas) and
i386-pc-solaris2.11 (as and gas).
2023-11-23 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
libsanitizer:
PR sanitizer/112563
* configure.ac (libsanitizer_cv_as_sym_assign): Check for
assembler symbol assignment support.
* configure: Regenerate.
* asan/Makefile.am (DEFS): Add @AS_SYM_ASSIGN_DEFS@.
* Makefile.in, asan/Makefile.in, hwasan/Makefile.in,
interception/Makefile.in, libbacktrace/Makefile.in,
lsan/Makefile.in, sanitizer_common/Makefile.in, tsan/Makefile.in,
ubsan/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-28 13:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-28 13:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-28 15:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-28 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth <ro@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33b6ce99b54917a910b59dbd643fd223fbba834c
commit r14-5928-g33b6ce99b54917a910b59dbd643fd223fbba834c
Author: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: Tue Nov 28 14:55:52 2023 +0100
libsanitizer: Only use assembler symbol assignment if supported [PR112563]
This patch only enables symbol assignment if the configure test determined
it's supported.
Bootstrapped without regressions on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (as and gas) and
i386-pc-solaris2.11 (as and gas).
2023-11-23 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
libsanitizer:
PR sanitizer/112563
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine_builtins.h: Check
HAVE_AS_SYM_ASSIGN.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/112563] [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as
2023-11-16 10:20 [Bug sanitizer/112563] New: [14 regression] libsanitizer doesn't assemble with Solaris/sparc as ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-28 13:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-11-28 15:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-28 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 14.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread