public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:48:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113208-4-eOTk2tL0S3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #25)
>
> If constexpr changes how the constructor is generated, isn't this violation
> of ODR?
Note the original code didn't have the constexpr change. And IIRC constexpr in
libstdc++ might be different depending on the language, C++11 vs C++17 in many
cases too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 19:56 [Bug lto/113208] New: [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 20:02 ` [Bug lto/113208] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-02 20:23 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-06 6:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:53 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-18 7:45 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-18 7:46 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-23 9:58 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-23 10:32 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 13:52 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 13:53 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 13:53 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 14:25 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 14:34 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 17:45 ` [Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 19:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:03 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:03 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-24 20:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-25 23:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 10:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 14:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 7:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 13:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-15 15:46 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-15 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-04-15 15:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-15 17:15 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-16 8:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-16 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-16 15:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-16 16:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-16 18:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-25 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-25 18:49 ` [Bug lto/113208] [15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-15 16:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113208-4-eOTk2tL0S3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).