public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
@ 2024-01-11  5:33 zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-01-11 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113323] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2024-01-11  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323

            Bug ID: 113323
           Summary: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have
                    vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at
                    gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Created attachment 57033
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57033&action=edit
reduced testcase

Compiler output:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c
during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:6:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected none of
vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at
gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131
    6 | foo (void)
      | ^~~
0x890e56 tree_not_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char const*,
...)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.cc:8989
0xd7cac1 tree_not_check(tree_node*, char const*, int, char const*, tree_code)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:3621
0xd7cac1 bitint_precision_kind
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131
0x26567af before_dom_children
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5507
0x261e1ce dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/domwalk.cc:311
0x266abe9 gimple_lower_bitint
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc:6285
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest-amd64/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-r14-7127-20240110200826-g2105c49bbe8-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-nls --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df,extra
--disable-bootstrap --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-7127-20240110200826-g2105c49bbe8-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20240111 (experimental) (GCC)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/113323] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
  2024-01-11  5:33 [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt() zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2024-01-11 13:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-12 10:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-11 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-11

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57043
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57043&action=edit
gcc14-pr113323.patch

Untested fix.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/113323] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
  2024-01-11  5:33 [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt() zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-01-11 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113323] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-12 10:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-12 10:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-20 17:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-12 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323

--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2d66158541c0923620b044098bf66a73b51c463

commit r14-7180-ga2d66158541c0923620b044098bf66a73b51c463
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 12 11:20:40 2024 +0100

    lower-bitint: Fix a typo in a condition [PR113323]

    The following testcase revealed a typo in condition, as the comment
    says the intent is
           /*  If lhs of stmt is large/huge _BitInt SSA_NAME not in m_names
               it means it will be handled in a loop or straight line code
               at the location of its (ultimate) immediate use, so for
               vop checking purposes check these only at the ultimate
               immediate use.  */
    but the condition was using != BITINT_TYPE rather than == BITINT_TYPE,
    so e.g. it used bitint_precision_kind on non-BITINT_TYPEs (e.g. on vector
    types it will crash because TYPE_PRECISION means something different there,
    or on say INTEGER_TYPEs the precision will never be large enough to be >=
    bitint_prec_large).

    The following patch fixes that.

    2024-01-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/113323
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_dom_walker::before_dom_children):
Fix
            check for lhs being large/huge _BitInt not in m_names.

            * gcc.dg/bitint-68.c: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/113323] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
  2024-01-11  5:33 [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt() zsojka at seznam dot cz
  2024-01-11 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113323] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-12 10:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-12 10:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-20 17:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-12 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/113323] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
  2024-01-11  5:33 [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt() zsojka at seznam dot cz
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-12 10:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-20 17:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-20 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-20 17:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-11  5:33 [Bug tree-optimization/113323] New: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt() zsojka at seznam dot cz
2024-01-11 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113323] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 10:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-12 10:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-20 17:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).