public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:51:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113450-4-PDdQZ7nZuI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #17 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The tests that GCC's internal notion of the types agrees with the headers are
> in gcc.dg/c99-stdint-5.c and gcc.dg/c99-stdint-6.c.
Ah, now I remember: they had to be adjusted back in the day for various
omissions on Solaris and Tru64 UNIX.
During my recent test bootstrap, they didn't show up because I had
changed <sys/int_types.h> and sol2.h's INT8_TYPE etc. in lockstep, so no
inconsistencies occured.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 15:06 [Bug libstdc++/113450] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-17 15:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/113450] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-17 21:32 ` [Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18 10:06 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-01-18 12:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18 12:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18 21:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-19 8:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-14 16:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 16:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 16:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 17:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-20 16:09 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-20 16:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-20 16:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-21 9:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-21 11:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 13:34 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2024-02-21 16:42 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 8:51 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2024-02-26 13:40 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113450-4-PDdQZ7nZuI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).