public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:39:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113907-4-KL1I3gahpA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907

--- Comment #59 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
just to explain what happens in the testcase.  There is test and testb. They
are almost same:

int
testb(void)
{
  struct bar *fp;
  test2 ((void *)&fp);
  fp = NULL;
  (*ptr)++;
  test3 ((void *)&fp);
}
the difference is in the alias set of FP. In one case it aliases with the
(*ptr)++ while in other it does not.  This makes one function to have jump
function specifying aggregate value of 0 for *fp, while other does not.

Now with LTO both struct bar and foo becomes compatible for TBAA, so the
functions gets merged and the winning variant has the jump function specifying
aggregate 0, which is wrong in the context code is invoked.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-13 12:49 [Bug middle-end/113907] New: [14 " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 12:55 ` [Bug middle-end/113907] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:00 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:17 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:18 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:19 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:22 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:23 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:24 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:56 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:58 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:19 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14  9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14  9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14  9:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 10:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-14 15:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 15:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 10:25 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:25 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-15 14:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-15 14:55 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-15 14:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-15 15:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 14:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:52 ` [Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 16:08 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-16 16:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 16:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-16 17:01 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2024-02-16 20:42 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2024-02-22  9:22 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 15:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 17:10 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:04 ` [Bug ipa/113907] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:06 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-11 11:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 14:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 15:21 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-03-14 16:20 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-14 16:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-03-14 16:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-14 16:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-19 17:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-19 18:41 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-03-20  9:05 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-20 18:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-20 18:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 15:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 12:25 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02  8:44 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-04-04 21:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08  9:33 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08  9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 16:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 17:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09  9:47   ` Jan Hubicka
2024-04-09  9:47 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-05-07  7:45 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 15:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-28 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113907-4-KL1I3gahpA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).