public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:27:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113907-4-epCpD5GqdU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #43)
> > // See discussion here:
> > // https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571709.html
> Discussion says:
>
> "Once legacy evrp is removed, this won't be an issue, as ranges in the IL
> will tell the truth. However, this will mean that we will no longer
> remove the first __builtin_unreachable combo. But ISTM, that would be
> correct behavior ??."
...
But that doesn't cause these problems, just perhaps losing some info, right?
If so, trying to change that feels like stage1 material to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 12:49 [Bug middle-end/113907] New: [14 " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 12:55 ` [Bug middle-end/113907] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:00 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 13:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:17 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:18 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:19 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:22 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:23 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:24 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:56 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 14:58 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:19 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 15:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-13 16:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 9:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 10:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-14 15:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 15:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 10:25 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:25 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 14:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-15 14:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-15 14:55 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-15 14:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-15 15:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 14:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:52 ` [Bug middle-end/113907] [12/13/14 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 16:08 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-16 16:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-02-16 16:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-16 17:01 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2024-02-16 20:42 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2024-02-22 9:22 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 15:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 17:10 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:04 ` [Bug ipa/113907] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:06 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-09 21:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-11 11:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 14:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 15:21 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-03-14 16:20 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-14 16:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-14 16:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-14 16:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-19 17:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-19 18:41 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-03-20 9:05 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-20 18:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-20 18:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 15:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 12:25 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 8:44 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-04-04 21:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 9:33 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 16:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 17:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09 9:47 ` Jan Hubicka
2024-04-09 9:47 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-05-07 7:45 ` [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 15:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-28 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113907-4-epCpD5GqdU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).