public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/114078] New: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions @ 2024-02-23 13:57 de34 at live dot cn 2024-02-23 17:47 ` [Bug c++/114078] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: de34 at live dot cn @ 2024-02-23 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114078 Bug ID: 114078 Summary: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: de34 at live dot cn Target Milestone: --- GCC currently accepts this wrong program while it shouldn't (https://godbolt.org/z/7jGnGqYPM), because member operator new/operator delete are always static member functions. #include <cstddef> #include <new> struct S { void* operator new(this std::size_t); void operator delete(this S*, std::destroying_delete_t); operator S*() const; operator std::size_t() const; }; int main() { S{}.operator new(); S{}.operator delete(std::destroying_delete); } Similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82249 which is fixed recently. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/114078] operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions 2024-02-23 13:57 [Bug c++/114078] New: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions de34 at live dot cn @ 2024-02-23 17:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:01 ` nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-23 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114078 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-02-23 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed, I thought I had saw one that was exactly the same as this but it seems maybe I was wrong. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/114078] operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions 2024-02-23 13:57 [Bug c++/114078] New: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions de34 at live dot cn 2024-02-23 17:47 ` [Bug c++/114078] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-23 6:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:01 ` nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-23 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114078 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead <nshead@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf51fe706ea0219beb5bb85e81606d372ca9635e commit r14-10085-gcf51fe706ea0219beb5bb85e81606d372ca9635e Author: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> Date: Sat Apr 20 15:08:02 2024 +1000 c++: Check if allocation functions are xobj members [PR114078] A class allocation member function is implicitly 'static' by [class.free] p3, so cannot have an explicit object parameter. PR c++/114078 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Check allocation functions for xobj parameters. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/114078] operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions 2024-02-23 13:57 [Bug c++/114078] New: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions de34 at live dot cn 2024-02-23 17:47 ` [Bug c++/114078] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-23 6:01 ` nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: nshead at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-23 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114078 Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org CC| |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed for GCC 14. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-23 6:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-02-23 13:57 [Bug c++/114078] New: operator new and operator delete are incorrectly acceptable as explicit object member functions de34 at live dot cn 2024-02-23 17:47 ` [Bug c++/114078] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 6:01 ` nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).