[Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
@ 2012-06-11  8:35 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (17 more replies)
  0 siblings, 18 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

             Bug #: 53631
           Summary: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: redi@gcc.gnu.org


This is a placeholder bug for the missing <regex> functionality.

It's documented as missing in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011

The whole of Clause 28 is partially supported or not supported at all.

Until someone works on it there is really no point reporting bugs against
individual features.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bisqwit at iki dot fi
                 CC|                            |rleigh at debian dot org
                 CC|                            |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
                   |                            |gmail dot com
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bisqwit at iki dot fi
                 CC|                            |rleigh at debian dot org
                 CC|                            |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
                   |                            |gmail dot com
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bisqwit at iki dot fi
                 CC|                            |rleigh at debian dot org
                 CC|                            |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
                   |                            |gmail dot com
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
  2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com @ 2013-03-28 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Balakrishnan B <balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |balakrishnan.erode at gmail
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #5 from Balakrishnan B <balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com> 2013-03-28 15:17:16 UTC ---
Why is the priority just normal? I think its very much needed. I wish there was
a vote button for the issues.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-05-21  8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-05 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mjnxf at mailinator dot com

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-05-05 15:49:54 UTC ---
*** Bug 57173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-05-21  8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
  2013-05-21  8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-21  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |akim.demaille at gmail dot com

--- Comment #8 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> ---
Can't Boost people be asked if they'd donate their code?  It is my
understanding that it already happened, for instance for std::shared_ptr.

Note that the current situation, imho, is very bad.  Instead of a compile-time
failure, we get something that behaves more or less randomly at runtime.  This
is really bad for GCC's karma, and shows in way too many StackOverflow
questions for instance.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-21  8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-21  8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
  2013-05-21  9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rleigh at debian dot org @ 2013-05-21  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #9 from Roger Leigh <rleigh at debian dot org> ---
It would be better if <regex> did not exist at all until functional.  If I do
regular autoconf header checks, plus a check to make sure that the needed types
can be instantiated, then these all succeed despite it being broken.  I need to
do additional tests on top of this to actually check if it's truly functional,
and then fall back to boost::regex if not.  No other standard library feature
has (IME) needed such extra checking.

Regards,
Roger


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-21  8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
@ 2013-05-21  9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
  2013-05-21  9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-21  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #11 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> ---
Sorry, I didn't mean to be harsh, and I did try to propose a solution.  I can
easily guess that there is no reason for it to be easy or even possible, but
can't Boost people be asked if they'd contribute?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-21  9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-21  9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-21  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's a possibility, but personally I have other things to work on.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-21  9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-06-23  2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-03 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andy at aligature dot com

--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 57513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-23  2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
  2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com @ 2013-06-23  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Simbaba <zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com

--- Comment #14 from Simbaba <zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com> ---
Most guy need this feature, but just partial implemented. 
However, we have many choice, maybe CLANG or posix, or perl-regex.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-23  2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
@ 2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2013-09-30  9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |snypxy at yandex dot com

--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
*** Bug 57984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-09-30  9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-09-30  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |galens at capaccess dot org

--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 58576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-09-30  9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: timshen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-01 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #17 from Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now regex is implemented. Should come with GCC 4.9 :)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-10 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.9.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-10 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yuecat0 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-20 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stick at gk2 dot sk

--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
  2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-20 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |luto at kernel dot org

--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 53561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-20 11:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-11  8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11  8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11  8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-21  8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21  8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
2013-05-21  9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21  9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-23  2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-09-30  9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).