public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
@ 2012-06-11 8:35 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 more replies)
0 siblings, 18 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Bug #: 53631
Summary: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: redi@gcc.gnu.org
This is a placeholder bug for the missing <regex> functionality.
It's documented as missing in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011
The whole of Clause 28 is partially supported or not supported at all.
Until someone works on it there is really no point reporting bugs against
individual features.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bisqwit at iki dot fi
CC| |rleigh at debian dot org
CC| |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
| |gmail dot com
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bisqwit at iki dot fi
CC| |rleigh at debian dot org
CC| |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
| |gmail dot com
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-06-11 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bisqwit at iki dot fi
CC| |rleigh at debian dot org
CC| |whatmannerofburgeristhis at
| |gmail dot com
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-11 08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com @ 2013-03-28 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Balakrishnan B <balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |balakrishnan.erode at gmail
| |dot com
--- Comment #5 from Balakrishnan B <balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com> 2013-03-28 15:17:16 UTC ---
Why is the priority just normal? I think its very much needed. I wish there was
a vote button for the issues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-21 8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-05 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjnxf at mailinator dot com
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-05-05 15:49:54 UTC ---
*** Bug 57173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-05-21 8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21 8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-21 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |akim.demaille at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> ---
Can't Boost people be asked if they'd donate their code? It is my
understanding that it already happened, for instance for std::shared_ptr.
Note that the current situation, imho, is very bad. Instead of a compile-time
failure, we get something that behaves more or less randomly at runtime. This
is really bad for GCC's karma, and shows in way too many StackOverflow
questions for instance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-21 8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-21 8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
2013-05-21 9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rleigh at debian dot org @ 2013-05-21 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #9 from Roger Leigh <rleigh at debian dot org> ---
It would be better if <regex> did not exist at all until functional. If I do
regular autoconf header checks, plus a check to make sure that the needed types
can be instantiated, then these all succeed despite it being broken. I need to
do additional tests on top of this to actually check if it's truly functional,
and then fall back to boost::regex if not. No other standard library feature
has (IME) needed such extra checking.
Regards,
Roger
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-21 8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
@ 2013-05-21 9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21 9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-21 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #11 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> ---
Sorry, I didn't mean to be harsh, and I did try to propose a solution. I can
easily guess that there is no reason for it to be easy or even possible, but
can't Boost people be asked if they'd contribute?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-21 9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2013-05-21 9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-21 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's a possibility, but personally I have other things to work on.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-21 9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-23 2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-03 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andy at aligature dot com
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 57513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-23 2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com @ 2013-06-23 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Simbaba <zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from Simbaba <zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com> ---
Most guy need this feature, but just partial implemented.
However, we have many choice, maybe CLANG or posix, or perl-regex.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-23 2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
@ 2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-09-30 9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |snypxy at yandex dot com
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
*** Bug 57984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-09-30 9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-09-30 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |galens at capaccess dot org
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 58576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-30 9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: timshen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-01 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now regex is implemented. Should come with GCC 4.9 :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-10 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yuecat0 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-10 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-20 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stick at gk2 dot sk
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-20 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |luto at kernel dot org
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 53561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-20 11:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-11 8:35 [Bug libstdc++/53631] New: [C++11] <regex> is unimplemented redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/53631] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-11 8:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-28 15:17 ` balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com
2013-05-05 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-21 8:09 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21 8:48 ` rleigh at debian dot org
2013-05-21 9:00 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2013-05-21 9:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-03 14:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-23 2:10 ` zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
2013-07-25 10:38 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-09-30 9:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-01 15:38 ` timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 17:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-20 23:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 11:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).