public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-bzU4JykAir@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089

--- Comment #25 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-07 23:31:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28633
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28633
Arithmetic right shift rework 2

This could be an alternative approach for the arith right shifts.
Applied to rev 193240:

CSiBE -m4-single -O2 -ml -mpretend-cmove
sum:  3159747 -> 3160047    +300 / +0.009494 %

CSiBE -m2 -O2 -ml
sum:  3314907 -> 3313319    -1588 / -0.047905 %

The idea here is to let arith shifts initially go through a slightly more
complex pattern 'ashrsi3_bridge_const', which allows the lib function address
or shad constant to be CSE'ed early on.
As mentioned in comment #18, the arith -> logical shift conversion is done by
combine only under certain circumstances.  After some trial and error I arrived
at the 'ashrsi3_bridge_const' pattern, which makes combine convert most of the
arith shifts into logical shifts.  In some cases it also finds more
opportunities, but regressions like this one still remain:

void MC_put_xy_16_c
(uint8_t * dest, const uint8_t * ref, const int stride, int height)
{
  // must see a shlr instead of 2x shar.
  // somehow the loop prevents this...
  do
  {
    dest[0] = (((ref[0]+ref[0 +1]+(ref+stride)[0]+(ref+stride)[0 +1]+2)>>2));
    ref += stride; dest += stride;
  } while (--height);
}

In addition to that, some unlucky register allocations appear, which cause
unneeded reg-reg copies (it seems something has trouble utilizing commutative
insns such as 'add').

The other problem is that patterns such as:

(define_insn_and_split "*lshrsi3"
  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arith_reg_dest")
    (lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_reg_operand")
             (match_operand:SI 2 "shift_count_operand")))
   (clobber (reg:SI T_REG))
   (use (match_operand:SI 3 "general_operand"))
   (use (match_operand:SI 4 "general_operand"))]
  "TARGET_SH1 && can_create_pseudo_p () && CONST_INT_P (operands[2])"
  "#"
  "&& 1"
  [(const_int 0)]
{
  emit_insn (gen_lshrsi3 (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
  DONE;
})

have to be added for combine to convert more arith -> logical shifts.  In this
patch I've added only one such pattern.  However, if for example zero_extract
patterns are added, variations such as above would be required, too.  This
looks discomforting to me.  Maybe the better solution would indeed be to add a
arith -> logical shift conversion pass before combine, or try to convert arith
shifts in the split pass after combine by looking at the data flow of the
shifted values.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-07 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24 23:42 [Bug target/54089] New: " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-24 23:46 ` [Bug target/54089] " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-25 23:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-27 17:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-30  6:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 21:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:18 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10  0:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10 14:25 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com
2012-08-10 15:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-11 20:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 23:13 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 21:29 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-22 22:52 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-10 20:35 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-10 21:27 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-17 23:30 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-19 17:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-25 19:07 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-30 18:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-16 10:53 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-16 11:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 11:56 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-07 23:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-09 10:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-09 13:29 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-13  1:14 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-16 11:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 11:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-16 23:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-16 21:38 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 13:51 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 14:35 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:42 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 14:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-11  3:56 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-08-11 14:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-11 21:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-12  1:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01  7:32 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-01  8:21 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 11:18 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-01 12:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 17:45 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 20:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-03  7:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-03  8:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-03 15:43 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-03 16:09 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-04 18:35 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-05  0:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 10:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 10:51 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 12:17 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 12:39 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 12:55 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 16:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 19:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 23:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-08 12:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 12:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 13:22 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-08 15:22 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 20:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-14  9:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-14  9:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-16 13:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-16 21:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17  6:08 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17  7:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17  8:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17  9:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17 11:00 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17 17:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 11:28 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 17:03 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 23:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 11:51 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-21 20:13 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 20:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-22 11:44 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 12:34 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-23  6:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-23  6:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 14:11 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-06 14:16 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 11:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-07 11:45 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-08  7:56 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-09 13:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10 14:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-13 23:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 14:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-10-13  5:02 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14 15:20 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-10-15  1:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54089-4-bzU4JykAir@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).