public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:11:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-vhRs7IzxBa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089

--- Comment #94 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #92)
> I remembered why I used two different insns - first to eliminate infinite
> loop with help of marking insn with attribute, and second because I could
> not set attribute when emitting insn from C code. Whe have 'get_attr_*'
> functions but we have not 'set_attr_*'.

An attribute is part of the instruction *definition*, the define_insn; it isn't
a property you put on one instance of it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24 23:42 [Bug target/54089] New: " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-24 23:46 ` [Bug target/54089] " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-25 23:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-27 17:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-30  6:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 21:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:18 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 23:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10  0:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-10 14:25 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com
2012-08-10 15:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-11 20:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 23:13 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 21:29 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-22 22:52 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-10 20:35 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-10 21:27 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-17 23:30 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-19 17:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-25 19:07 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-30 18:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-16 10:53 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-16 11:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-06 11:56 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-07 23:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-09 10:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-09 13:29 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-13  1:14 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-16 11:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 11:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-16 23:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-16 21:38 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 13:51 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 14:35 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:42 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-30 14:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-05-30 14:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-11  3:56 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2015-08-11 14:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-11 21:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-12  1:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01  7:32 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-01  8:21 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 11:18 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-01 12:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 17:45 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-01 20:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-03  7:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-03  8:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-03 15:43 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-03 16:09 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-04 18:35 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-05  0:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 10:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 10:51 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 12:17 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 12:39 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 12:55 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 16:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 19:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-06 23:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-08 12:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 12:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 13:22 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-08 15:22 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-08 20:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-14  9:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-14  9:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-16 13:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-16 21:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17  6:08 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17  7:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17  8:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17  9:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17 11:00 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-17 17:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 11:28 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 17:03 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-20 23:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 11:51 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-21 20:13 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 20:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-22 11:44 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 12:34 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-23  6:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-06-23  6:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 14:11 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-07-06 14:16 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 11:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-07 11:45 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-08  7:56 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-09 13:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10 14:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-07-13 23:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 14:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-10-13  5:02 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14 15:20 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com
2023-10-15  1:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-54089-4-vhRs7IzxBa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).