public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:51:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-54089-4-zzfmtYjSbV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-54089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #61 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #60) > > Maybe it's easier to add some shift specific passes. > > Well, I couldn't think of anything better and ported the loop optimization > pass. More precisely, all loop optimization passes, because they are tied to > each other. They run after split1 pass. And it worked! > > I want to beleive that another loop optimization pass won't break anything > because loops are already optimized. Theoretically it should't ... > > If that's redundant, I thought of expanding libcall if it's inside a loop > before loop optimization passes. I'm a bit concerned about the increased compile time. Have you observed anything (negative) in this regard? Loop, hoist, constant propagation etc (+ all the good stuff) optimizations are done before insn combine / split1. We could add a simple SH specific pass that goes over the RTL and does stuff to shifts before those other optimizations. However, it might miss insn combine opportunities later on. I'm thinking about your tst #imm,r0 case from before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 10:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-07-24 23:42 [Bug target/54089] New: " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-24 23:46 ` [Bug target/54089] " olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 23:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-27 17:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-30 6:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 21:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:18 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 0:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 14:25 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-08-10 15:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-11 20:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 23:13 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 21:29 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-22 22:52 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-10 20:35 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-10 21:27 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-17 23:30 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-19 17:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 19:07 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 18:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16 10:53 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16 11:49 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06 11:56 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 23:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 10:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 13:29 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 1:14 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-16 11:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-12-17 11:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-05-16 23:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-16 21:38 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-30 13:51 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2015-05-30 14:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-30 14:35 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2015-05-30 14:42 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-30 14:46 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2015-05-30 14:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-11 3:56 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2015-08-11 14:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-11 21:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-12 1:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-01 7:32 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-01 8:21 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-01 11:18 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-01 12:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-01 17:45 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-01 20:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-03 7:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-03 8:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-03 15:43 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-03 16:09 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-04 18:35 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-05 0:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-06 10:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-06 10:51 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-06-06 12:17 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-06 12:39 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-06 12:55 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-06 16:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-06 19:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-06 23:11 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-08 12:07 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-08 12:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-08 13:22 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-08 15:22 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-08 20:17 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-14 9:30 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-14 9:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-16 13:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-16 21:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 6:08 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-17 7:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 8:24 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-17 9:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 11:00 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-17 17:57 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-20 11:28 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-20 17:03 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-20 23:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 11:51 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-21 20:13 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 20:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 11:09 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-22 11:44 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 12:34 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-23 6:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-06-23 6:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 14:11 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-06 14:16 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 11:10 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-07-07 11:45 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-08 7:56 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-07-09 13:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 14:02 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-07-13 23:40 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-14 14:31 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-10-13 5:02 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-14 15:20 ` klepikov.alex+bugs at gmail dot com 2023-10-15 1:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-54089-4-zzfmtYjSbV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).