public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted
@ 2014-04-03 23:22 filip.roseen at gmail dot com
2014-11-26 17:13 ` [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: filip.roseen at gmail dot com @ 2014-04-03 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Bug ID: 60753
Summary: defining an explicit function template specialization
as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not
diagnosted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: filip.roseen at gmail dot com
Created attachment 32537
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32537&action=edit
testcase.cpp
template<class T> void func (T);
template<> void func<int> (int);
template<> void func<int> (int) = delete;
int main () { }
------------------------------------------------------------------------
`gcc` accepts the above snippet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The previous snippet is ill-formed according to [dcl.fct.def.delete]p4:
> A deleted definition of a function shall be the first declaration
> of the function or, for an explicit specialization of a function
> template, the first declaration of that specialization.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
`clang` correctly issues the following diagnostic:
testcase.cpp:4:35: error: deleted definition must be first declaration
template<> void func<int> (int) = delete;
^
testcase.cpp:3:17: note: previous declaration is here
template<> void func<int> (int);
^
------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted
2014-04-03 23:22 [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted filip.roseen at gmail dot com
@ 2014-11-26 17:13 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-01-07 19:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2014-11-26 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted
2014-04-03 23:22 [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted filip.roseen at gmail dot com
2014-11-26 17:13 ` [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2015-01-07 19:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-01-08 15:49 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-08 16:10 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2015-01-07 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted
2014-04-03 23:22 [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted filip.roseen at gmail dot com
2014-11-26 17:13 ` [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-01-07 19:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2015-01-08 15:49 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-08 16:10 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-08 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jan 8 15:48:36 2015
New Revision: 219347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-01-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/60753
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Add bool parameter.
(grokdeclarator): Adjust calls.
(start_decl): Don't set DECL_DELETED_FN here.
/testsuite
2015-01-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/60753
* g++.dg/cpp0x/deleted10.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/deleted10.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted
2014-04-03 23:22 [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted filip.roseen at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-08 15:49 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-08 16:10 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2015-01-08 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Fixed for 5.0.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-08 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-03 23:22 [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted filip.roseen at gmail dot com
2014-11-26 17:13 ` [Bug c++/60753] Deleted definition of an explicit function template specialization, following a declaration, incorrectly accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-01-07 19:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2015-01-08 15:49 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-08 16:10 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).