* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-13 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-14 8:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-13 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There was never the promise that the plugin API were anything close to
"stable".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 14:41 ` [Bug plugins/61176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-14 8:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-14 10:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-14 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
is this about stability? With trying, you find out that the following will
work:
#include <gcc-plugin.h>
#include <tree.h>
#include <function.h>
#include <basic-block.h>
#include <coretypes.h>
#include <is-a.h>
#include <predict.h>
#include <internal-fn.h>
#include <tree-ssa-alias.h>
#include <gimple-expr.h>
#include <gimple.h>
int main(void) {
return 0;
}
is there any way to find out all the needed includes? Telling plugin writers
to hard-code all of this doesn't seem like a viable solution.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 14:41 ` [Bug plugins/61176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-14 8:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-14 10:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-14 12:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-14 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
IMHO the header flattening is a serious mistake, but others think otherwise :(.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 10:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-14 12:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2014-05-14 12:21 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2014-05-14 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
We have to flatten it before we can fix it... its a complete dependency mess.
you could create a plugin-includes.h which includes all the files from the
primary globbing files that were flattened (gimple.h and tree.h). Start by
copying all the original includes from those 2 files. Then each plugin
doesn't have to figure out what it needs... at least until we get back to a
reasonable state.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 12:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
@ 2014-05-14 12:21 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2014-05-14 12:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2014-05-14 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
btw, the long term plan is that #include "gimple.h" will get all the basic
prerequisites you need to manipulate gimple. And then you just #include any
extras your specific task requires. We're just in a transition state this
release as we flatten to reconstruct a more sensible modular layout.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 12:21 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
@ 2014-05-14 12:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2014-05-14 13:39 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2014-05-14 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com> ---
Am 14.05.2014 14:21, schrieb amacleod at redhat dot com:
> btw, the long term plan is that #include "gimple.h" will get all the basic
> prerequisites you need to manipulate gimple. And then you just #include any
> extras your specific task requires. We're just in a transition state this
> release as we flatten to reconstruct a more sensible modular layout.
this is for 4.10, but what to do about 4.9? Maybe have gimple-plugin.h and
tree-plugin.h headers, which won't go away for 4.10 and then would just include
gimple.h and tree.h? I would appreciate if you could name all the toplevel
headers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 12:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2014-05-14 13:39 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2014-05-25 20:07 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2014-05-14 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
Thats part of the fun. There is little rhyme nor reason to what includes what
right now.. it was purely demand driven over many years. For your current
purposes, gimple.h and tree.h were the primary accumulators we have already
flattened, but there are a lot of include files which include 4 or 5 or 7 or
more other files. Some where flattened, others haven't been tackled yet.
We're trying to move to the include what you use model... with .h files
containing just the exports for their .c file, and a few module headers which
do some aggregation of common/required headers. Eventually including gimple.h
alone will compile and provide basic manipulation routines, but you may still
need to include other files depending on what you actually require.
Plugins can either follow the same model, or could have one giant accumulator
which includes everything... It sounds like the latter may be better for the
interm, but I would encourage it to revert to the same model once the work is
complete.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 13:39 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
@ 2014-05-25 20:07 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
2014-05-26 4:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2014-05-25 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pageexec at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
I maintain a compatibility header for gcc plugins that also happens to include
all the headers that we needed so far:
https://www.grsecurity.net/~paxguy1/gcc-common.h (this copy may not always be
up-to-date, the latest version is inside the PaX patch). As for
include-what-you-use, I think it's not a viable model for plugins that want to
support a range of gcc versions...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-25 20:07 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
@ 2014-05-26 4:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2014-07-16 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2014-05-26 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
sooooo. Include them all with an accumulator file as suggested? Over a run of
multiple generations you have to expect some sort of flux in include structure,
especially since we don't guarantee much. The only way I see you can have any
kind of stability is to have a standard file you include which can adjust and
include whatever is needed for any given release.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-26 4:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
@ 2014-07-16 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:38 ` [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-16 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.1 |4.9.2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/5 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-16 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-30 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01 12:03 ` [Bug plugins/61176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-30 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.9.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-30 10:38 ` [Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-01 12:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01 13:58 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-01 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |---
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] plugin |plugin builds including
|builds including gimple.h |gimple.h not building
|not building |
Known to fail|4.10.0 |5.0
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Surely not a "regression" in the classical sense but a plugin bug or a plugin
(stable-) API deficiency.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-01 12:03 ` [Bug plugins/61176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-01 13:58 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2015-03-26 5:58 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2014-12-01 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
gcc-plugin.h has had a number of includes added to ease the pain of flattening
basic-block.h and cgraph.h this release. If there are still issues with tree.h
or others, submit a patch which adds the required includes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-01 13:58 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
@ 2015-03-26 5:58 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
2015-03-26 10:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2015-03-26 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #14 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
it seems that gcc/builtins.h doesn't get installed for plugins.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-26 5:58 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
@ 2015-03-26 10:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-26 10:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-26 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
builtins.h has been already in 4.9, just contained far less info and thus has
been less important.
Quick check of new headers in toplevel directory that most likely aren't in
PLUGIN_HEADERS reveals also:
auto-profile.h
ccmp.h
collect-utils.h
dojump.h
explow.h
fibonacci_heap.h
gcse-common.h
generic-match.h
gimple-match.h
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.h
ifcvt.h
ipa-chkp.h
ipa-icf-gimple.h
ipa-icf.h
loop-unroll.h
lto-section-names.h
regcprop.h
rtl-chkp.h
rtlhash.h
rtl-iter.h
shrink-wrap.h
symbol-summary.h
tree-chkp.h
Supposedly we should include those in PLUGIN_HEADERS too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-26 10:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-26 10:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-26 11:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-26 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
And comparing the right now installed headers with what is in gcc/*.h gcc/*.def
reveals also:
addresses.h
asan.h
bb-reorder.h
builtin-attrs.def
builtins.h
builtin-types.def
cilk.h
collect2-aix.h
collect2.h
conditions.h
convert.h
coverage.h
cppbuiltin.h
cselib.h
data-streamer.h
dbgcnt.def
dbgcnt.h
dbxout.h
dce.h
ddg.h
dfp.h
domwalk.h
dwarf2asm.h
dwarf2out.h
errors.h
et-forest.h
expmed.h
expr.h
file-find.h
gcc.h
gcov-counter.def
gcov-io.h
gcse.h
gengtype.h
gensupport.h
ggc-internal.h
gimple-streamer.h
glimits.h
graphds.h
graph.h
graphite-poly.h
graphite-scop-detection.h
graphite-sese-to-poly.h
gstab.h
gsyms.h
gsyslimits.h
hooks.h
hosthooks-def.h
hosthooks.h
hw-doloop.h
insn-addr.h
ipa-inline.h
ira.h
ira-int.h
langhooks-def.h
libfuncs.h
limitx.h
limity.h
lower-subreg.h
lra.h
lra-int.h
lto-compress.h
lto-streamer.h
machmode.def
omega.h
omp-low.h
optabs.def
optabs.h
opts-diagnostic.h
passes.def
profile.h
read-md.h
recog.h
regrename.h
regs.h
reload.h
rtl-error.h
rtlhooks-def.h
sched-int.h
sdbout.h
sel-sched-dump.h
sel-sched.h
sel-sched-ir.h
sese.h
sparseset.h
sreal.h
stab.def
streamer-hooks.h
target-def.h
target-globals.h
targhooks.h
trans-mem.h
tree-affine.h
tree-browser.def
tree-chrec.h
tree-data-ref.h
tree-diagnostic.h
tree-scalar-evolution.h
tree-ssa-live.h
tree-ssa-propagate.h
tree-stdarg.h
tree-streamer.h
tree-vectorizer.h
tsan.h
tsystem.h
typeclass.h
ubsan.h
valtrack.h
value-prof.h
vmsdbg.h
vtable-verify.h
xcoff.h
xcoffout.h
(already existing in 4.9). So, how do we decide which of these headers are
interesting to plugin writers?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-26 10:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-26 11:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-26 12:41 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-26 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35144&action=edit
gcc5-pr61176.patch
Patch to install all gcc/*.h and gcc/*.def headers, even when they aren't
listed in PLUGIN_HEADERS.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-26 11:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-26 12:41 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
2015-03-31 8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-06 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pageexec at gmail dot com @ 2015-03-26 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #18 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> Created attachment 35144 [details]
> gcc5-pr61176.patch
>
> Patch to install all gcc/*.h and gcc/*.def headers, even when they aren't
> listed in PLUGIN_HEADERS.
thanks, this will be a big (future-proof) step towards writing plugins! on a
related note, there's PR61311 where (among other issues) i list a few more
missing headers needed for LTO. some would now be handled with the wildcard
match however there's still a few missing:
gcc/lto/lto.h
<build_dir>/gcc/gcov-iov.h
while lto/lto.h is probably easy to add, i'm not sure about the build-time
generated one...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-26 12:41 ` pageexec at gmail dot com
@ 2015-03-31 8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-06 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-31 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 31 05:31:57 2015
New Revision: 221786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR plugins/61176
* Makefile.in (install-plugin): Add all gcc/*.{h,def} files
automatically to $headers.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
2014-05-13 14:01 [Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-31 8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-06 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-06 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Definitely has been fixed for a while.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread