[Bug middle-end/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[Bug middle-end/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
                   |                            |.ch

--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
possibly related to PR63470 ?

[Bug middle-end/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-11-19
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

[Bug middle-end/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
         Depends on|                            |63470

--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Quite possibly. r217633 does not change anything in inliner, so it looks like
semi-latent bug in mainline got exposed.  I will look at PR63470 because it has
testcase...

[Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Waiting for PR63470 to be resolved.

[Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|63470                       |
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bug in PRPR63470  is C++ only. I however commited today another fix for this
ICE occuring with ICF and -fprofile-use. So I believe this bug should be fixed.
Can you, please, confirm it?

[Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967
> 
> Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|WAITING                     |NEW
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> > Bug in PRPR63470  is C++ only. I however commited today another fix for this
> > ICE occuring with ICF and -fprofile-use. So I believe this bug should be
> > fixed. Can you, please, confirm it?
> 
> The profiledbootstrap with r219444 still fails [1].
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-01/msg00182.html

Have patch for that ICE too (profiledbootstrap running, will comit it once it
finishes)

Honza
>From gcc-bugs-return-472753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:08:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21393 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:08:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21359 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:08:19 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64550] [5 Regression] IPA fixes cause ICE in tree-ssa.c:939
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64550-4-GyI515gwvF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00747.txt.bz2
Content-length: 731

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64550

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Author: marxin
> Date: Mon Jan 12 09:02:33 2015
> New Revision: 219449
> 
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219449&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> PR ipa/64550
> 
>         PR ipa/64551
> 	PR ipa/64552
> 	* ipa-icf.c (sem_function::equals_private): Use '&&' instead of
> 	'||' to fix typo issue.
> 
> 	* gcc/tree.h (target_opts_for_fn): Check NULL_TREE since it can
> 	accept and return NULL.
> 
> 
> Modified:
>     trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
>     trunk/gcc/ipa-icf.c
>     trunk/gcc/tree.h

Wrong PR link, this revision does not fix this issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-472755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:12:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28051 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:12:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27998 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:12:22 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64377] nios2 compile error in options-save.c
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64377-4-mVZ2vcwsqV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00749.txt.bz2
Content-length: 567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hello.

There's suggested patch [1], may I ask someone from nios2 community for testing
the patch?

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00465.html

Thanks,
Martin
>From gcc-bugs-return-472756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:15:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31333 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:15:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31285 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:15:39 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64374-4-PVl0PmB6yb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2
Content-length: 468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Similar to PR64412, it looks to me that this PR needs similar treatment.

Adding CC.
>From gcc-bugs-return-472757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:24:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3472 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:24:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3405 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:24:26 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64374-4-y2QXObyCc5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00751.txt.bz2
Content-length: 584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd374

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It can't have the same resolution though, that PR was resolved by not streaming
the target nodes at all for offloading.  In this case there is no offloading.
If flag_pic is recorded somewhere in target node (where, x86_isa_flags,
somewhere else?), then supposedly during LTO reading that should be updated
from global flag_pic.  I think it doesn't make sense to have flag_pic only in
some routines and not in others, so flag_pic should be treated as a global
flag.

[Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Jan 12 09:28:15 2015
New Revision: 219452

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

    PR ipa/63967
    PR ipa/64425
    * ipa-inline.c (compute_uninlined_call_time,
    compute_inlined_call_time): Use counts for extra precision when
    needed possible.
    (big_speedup_p): Fix formating.
    (RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE): Remove.
    (relative_time_benefit): Remove.
    (edge_badness): Turn DECL_DISREGARD_INLINE_LIMITS into hint;
    merge guessed and read profile paths.
    (inline_small_functions): Count only !optimize_size functions into
    initial size; be more lax about sanity check when profile is used;
    be sure to update inlined function profile when profile is read.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c

[Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed.