public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-01-05 16:16 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-03 20:24 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-05 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> C++11 says that the address of __func__ can be the same as address of other
> string literals, so I think that allows putting it into mergeable section.
> But what isn't clear to me is if __func__ is used in some inline function,
> if the standard allows __func__ to have different addresses between
> different compilation units.
The Core WG seems to be moving toward dropping the requirement that string
literals have the same address in different compilation units, so I think we
don't need to worry about __func__ either.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-01-05 16:16 ` [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions? jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-03 20:24 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-03 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-02-03
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-01-05 16:16 ` [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions? jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-03 20:24 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-29 2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-29 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|6.5 |9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-29 2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-29 2:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-29 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.0 |6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-29 2:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-29 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-29 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|6.0 |9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-29 2:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-64266-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-01-05 16:16 ` [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions? jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-03 20:24 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-29 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).