public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgomp/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:15:09 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66005-4-EteDYJ8wZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> --- First, ACK, and "sorry". (As has been discussed in the past) we cannot just enable the standard GCC/DejaGnu parallel testing for the libgomp testsuite, because a lot of the test cases internally use parallelism, so we'd heavily oversubscribe system resources. However, there is one thing that I think we may do, and I'm expecting that to help a lot: parallelize *all* compilation, while just allowing for *one* execution test job slot. That will require some GCC DejaGnu test harness hackery which I've not yet gotten to look into. That is, enable the usual GCC/DejaGnu parallel testing, but also have some kind of mutex for the execution test invocation. This has to play nicely with DejaGnu timeout handling, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 14:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-05-04 13:38 [Bug libgomp/66005] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-21 20:42 ` [Bug libgomp/66005] " belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru 2022-02-08 14:15 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-05-29 5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-04 15:29 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-05 9:05 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 10:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 10:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 10:31 ` [Bug testsuite/66005] " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 11:15 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2023-05-15 11:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 14:22 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 18:35 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 20:06 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 20:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-15 20:42 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-16 7:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2023-05-16 7:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 7:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 10:07 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 10:16 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-05 14:52 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 12:51 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 13:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66005-4-EteDYJ8wZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).