public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:15:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66005-4-EteDYJ8wZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vries at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
First, ACK, and "sorry".


(As has been discussed in the past) we cannot just enable the standard
GCC/DejaGnu parallel testing for the libgomp testsuite, because a lot of the
test cases internally use parallelism, so we'd heavily oversubscribe system
resources.

However, there is one thing that I think we may do, and I'm expecting that to
help a lot: parallelize *all* compilation, while just allowing for *one*
execution test job slot.  That will require some GCC DejaGnu test harness
hackery which I've not yet gotten to look into.  That is, enable the usual
GCC/DejaGnu parallel testing, but also have some kind of mutex for the
execution test invocation.  This has to play nicely with DejaGnu timeout
handling, etc.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 13:38 [Bug libgomp/66005] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-21 20:42 ` [Bug libgomp/66005] " belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru
2022-02-08 14:15 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-05-29  5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04 15:29 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-05  9:05 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:31 ` [Bug testsuite/66005] " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 11:15 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-05-15 11:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 14:22 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 18:35 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:06 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:42 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16  7:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-05-16  7:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02  7:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:07 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:16 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 14:52 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 12:51 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 13:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-66005-4-EteDYJ8wZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).