public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 20:42:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66005-4-IoOGeBU0vM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66005-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005

Serge Belyshev <belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-01-21

--- Comment #1 from Serge Belyshev <belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru> ---
Confirmed, affects testing via qemu even on modern hardware.

On 32 thread amd64 zen3 box testsuite except libgomp completes in about 150
minutes,  libgomp adds 30..40 minutes to that.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 13:38 [Bug libgomp/66005] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-21 20:42 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru [this message]
2022-02-08 14:15 ` [Bug libgomp/66005] " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-29  5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04 15:29 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-05  9:05 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 10:31 ` [Bug testsuite/66005] " tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 11:15 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-05-15 11:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 14:22 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 18:35 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:06 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 20:42 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16  7:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-05-16  7:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02  7:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:07 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:16 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 14:52 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 12:51 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 13:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 11:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-66005-4-IoOGeBU0vM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).