public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/82064] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-05-14 9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/82064] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:57 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13/14 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:57 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13/14 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-04-18 16:57 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-18 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This seems to have been fixed in the dim and distant past but not closed.
GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.3.1 20191027 through the current mainline all produce the
two "OK"s and, yes, I did use the separate files.
Closing.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-18 16:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-82064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-18 16:57 ` [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13/14 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).