public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter
[not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-12-14 3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |4.1.2
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-12-14
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
Here is a c++98 testcase:
struct A {
template <typename T> void operator+(T &) ; // #1
};
template <typename T> bool operator+(T &, A &); // #2
bool g(A *ap) { return *ap + *ap; }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter
[not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=53499
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This related to PR 53499, might even be a dup.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter
[not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-01 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=53499 |
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This related to PR 53499, might even be a dup.
Yep, seems to be a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53499 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-01 18:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).