public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter [not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-12-14 3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |4.1.2 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2021-12-14 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. Here is a c++98 testcase: struct A { template <typename T> void operator+(T &) ; // #1 }; template <typename T> bool operator+(T &, A &); // #2 bool g(A *ap) { return *ap + *ap; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter [not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=53499 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This related to PR 53499, might even be a dup. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter [not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-01 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83371 Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=53499 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > This related to PR 53499, might even be a dup. Yep, seems to be a dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53499 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-01 18:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-83371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-12-14 3:01 ` [Bug c++/83371] Partial ordering ignores implicit object parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-14 3:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-01 18:33 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).