public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2023-06-02 8:10 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 16:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-02 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Ian,
This is one of two PRs (cf. 99065) that expose a really nasty fault with
gfortran parsing. If you interchange 's' and 'fun', you will find that the
testcase compiles and runs.
The fixup for intrinsic types works fine but, unfortunately, the derived type
is need for parsing the associate block itself.
I am girding my loins to fight the good fight.
Thanks for this posting.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-06-02 8:10 ` [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() ) pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-28 16:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-28 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 99065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-06-02 8:10 ` [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() ) pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 16:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-03 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-16 10:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-03 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 56775
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56775&action=edit
Deadend fix for this PR
I got as far as I could with this fix up method. The testcase below fails and
so I am going to set aside this approach and tackle what I should have done in
the first place: two step parsing of contained procedures.
The patch contains a fix for class array function selectors that do not work,
even if the selector function is parsed first. I will make a new PR for this
and will break out the patch for it and post it to the list.
Paul
module m
implicit none
type t
integer :: i = 0
end type t
integer :: i = 0
type(t), parameter :: test_array (2) = [t(42),t(84)], &
test_scalar = t(99)
end module m
module class_selectors
use m
implicit none
private
public foo2
contains
subroutine foo2()
associate (var1 => bar3())
if (any (var1%i .ne. test_array%i)) stop 8
if (var1(2)%i .ne. test_array(2)%i) stop 9
! associate (var3 => var1%i) ! This still fails
! print *, "yipee"
! end associate
select type (x => var1)
type is (t)
if (any (x%i .ne. test_array%i)) stop 10
if (x(1)%i .ne. test_array(1)%i) stop 11
class default
stop 12
end select
end associate
select type (y => bar3 ())
type is (t)
print *, "yes, size of 'y' is ", size(y), y(1)
class default
print *, "no"
end select
end subroutine foo2
! Since these functions are parsed after 'foo', the symbols were not available
! for the selectors and the fixup, tested here, was necessary.
function bar3() result(res)
class(t), allocatable :: res(:)
allocate (res, source = test_array)
end
end module class_selectors
use class_selectors
call foo2
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-03 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-16 10:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 6:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 7:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-16 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 56892
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56892&action=edit
An experimental patch for two pass compilation of contained procedures with
failures
I am giving up on this. Failures as follows:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_13_main.f03 -O (test for errors, line
5)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_13_main.f03 -O (test for errors, line
10)
Compiles without errors
FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_8.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/deferred_character_8.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Compiles and runs OK outside dejagnu
...repeats...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_16.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_16.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
...repeats...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_1.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_1.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
...repeats...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_13.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/entry_13.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
...repeats...
All three entry failures are due to:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x10941df crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.cc:316
0x10cf582 main_block_label
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:1533
0x10cf582 cleanup_dead_labels()
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:1718
0x10dd8d1 build_gimple_cfg
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:241
0x10dd8d1 execute_build_cfg
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:371
FAIL: gfortran.dg/host_assoc_call_3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Not finding the specific, doubly contained 'putaline'
gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90 -O (test for errors, line 34)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Error: ‘f2’ at (1) is not a variable instead of { dg-error "is not a VALUE" }
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer_assign_12.f90 -O (internal compiler error:
gimplification failed)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer_assign_12.f90 -O (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer_assign_12.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
10 | g => 1 ! { dg-error "Pointer assignment target cannot be a
constant" }
|
^
internal compiler error: gimplification failed
0xd6cd97 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.cc:17749
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for errors, line 15)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for errors, line 22)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x10941df crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.cc:316
0x97fd53 gfc_match_decl_type_spec(gfc_typespec*, int)
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/decl.cc:4281
0x9816bc gfc_match_data_decl()
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/decl.cc:6286
0x9f7a9f match_word
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.cc:92
0x9f7a9f decode_statement
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.cc:476
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 -O (test for errors, line 5)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Error: Function ‘erfc’ requires an argument list at (1)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102.f90 -O (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102.f90 -O (test for errors, line 14)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102.f90 -O (test for errors, line 17)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102.f90 -O (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
17 | if ( n /= 0 ) stop 1 ! { dg-error "internal procedure of the
same name" }
| 1
Error: Function ‘n’ requires an argument list at (1)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 14)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 15)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96102b.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Error: Unexpected use of subroutine name ‘n’ at (1)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
35 | call set_fun(aux)
| 1
Error: Type mismatch in argument ‘y’ at (1); passed REAL(4) to UNKNOWN
XPASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/coarray.f95 -O TODO (test for errors, line 27)
XPASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/cray-2.f95 -O TODO (test for errors, line 49)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/cray-2.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/cray.f95 -O TODO (test for errors, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/cray.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/declare-1.f95 -O (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/declare-1.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/loop-1-2.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/loop-1.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 49 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 50 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 51 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 52 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 53 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 54 (test for
warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 59 (test for
warnings, line 58)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 63 (test for
warnings, line 62)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 72 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 73 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 74 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 75 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 76 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 77 (test for
warnings, line 71)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 82 (test for
warnings, line 81)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 86 (test for
warnings, line 85)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 104 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 105 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 106 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 107 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 108 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 109 (test for
warnings, line 103)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 114 (test for
warnings, line 113)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 118 (test for
warnings, line 117)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 127 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 128 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 129 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 130 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 131 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 132 (test for
warnings, line 126)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 137 (test for
warnings, line 136)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O at line 141 (test for
warnings, line 140)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/nested-function-1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/parameter.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 52)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 56)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 69)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 77)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for warnings, line 87)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-5.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-12.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Aborted)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-12.f90 -O (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-12.f90 -O (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-12.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-13.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Aborted)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-13.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (internal compiler error:
free_expr0(): Bad expr type)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 38)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-13a.f90 -O (internal compiler error:
Aborted)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-13a.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O at line 42 (test for errors, line
41)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 45)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 48)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 56)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 58)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 63)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 70)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 74)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 82)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 88)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O at line 103 (test for errors, line
102)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O at line 104 (test for errors, line
102)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 108)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for errors, line 109)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/allocate-9.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/order-2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/teams-4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42181.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-16 10:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-15 6:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 7:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-15 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fd46d859cda1074125449a4cc680ce59fcebc38
commit r14-9489-g3fd46d859cda1074125449a4cc680ce59fcebc38
Author: Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri Mar 15 06:52:59 2024 +0000
Fortran: Fix class/derived/complex function associate selectors [PR87477]
2024-03-15 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/fortran
PR fortran/87477
PR fortran/89645
PR fortran/99065
PR fortran/114141
PR fortran/114280
* class.cc (gfc_change_class): New function needed for
associate names, when rank changes or a derived type is
produced by resolution
* dump-parse-tree.cc (show_code_node): Make output for SELECT
TYPE more comprehensible.
* expr.cc (find_inquiry_ref): Do not simplify expressions of
an inferred type.
* gfortran.h : Add 'gfc_association_list' to structure
'gfc_association_list'. Add prototypes for
'gfc_find_derived_types', 'gfc_fixup_inferred_type_refs' and
'gfc_change_class'. Add macro IS_INFERRED_TYPE.
* match.cc (copy_ts_from_selector_to_associate): Add bolean arg
'select_type' with default false. If this is a select type name
and the selector is a inferred type, build the class type and
apply it to the associate name.
(build_associate_name): Pass true to 'select_type' in call to
previous.
* parse.cc (parse_associate): If the selector is inferred type
the associate name is too. Make sure that function selector
class and rank, if known, are passed to the associate name. If
a function result exists, pass its typespec to the associate
name.
* primary.cc (resolvable_fcns): New function to check that all
the function references are resolvable.
(gfc_match_varspec): If a scalar derived type select type
temporary has an array reference, match the array reference,
treating this in the same way as an equivalence member. Do not
set 'inquiry' if applied to an unknown type the inquiry name
is ambiguous with the component of an accessible derived type.
Check that resolution of the target expression is OK by testing
if the symbol is declared or is an operator expression, then
using 'resolvable_fcns' recursively. If all is well, resolve
the expression. If this is an inferred type with a component
reference, call 'gfc_find_derived_types' to find a suitable
derived type. If there is an inquiry ref and the symbol either
is of unknown type or is inferred to be a derived type, set the
primary and symbol TKR appropriately.
* resolve.cc (resolve_variable): Call new function below.
(gfc_fixup_inferred_type_refs): New function to ensure that the
expression references for a inferred type are consistent with
the now fixed up selector.
(resolve_assoc_var): Ensure that derived type or class function
selectors transmit the correct arrayspec to the associate name.
(resolve_select_type): If the selector is an associate name of
inferred type and has no component references, the associate
name should have its typespec. Simplify the conversion of a
class array to class scalar by calling 'gfc_change_class'.
Make sure that a class, inferred type selector with an array
ref transfers the typespec from the symbol to the expression.
* symbol.cc (gfc_set_default_type): If an associate name with
unknown type has a selector expression, try resolving the expr.
(find_derived_types, gfc_find_derived_types): New functions
that search for a derived type with a given name.
* trans-expr.cc (gfc_conv_variable): Some inferred type exprs
escape resolution so call 'gfc_fixup_inferred_type_refs'.
* trans-stmt.cc (trans_associate_var): Tidy up expression for
'class_target'. Finalize and free class function results.
Correctly handle selectors that are class functions and class
array references, passed as derived types.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/87477
PR fortran/89645
PR fortran/99065
* gfortran.dg/associate_64.f90 : New test
* gfortran.dg/associate_66.f90 : New test
* gfortran.dg/associate_67.f90 : New test
PR fortran/114141
* gfortran.dg/associate_65.f90 : New test
PR fortran/114280
* gfortran.dg/associate_68.f90 : New test
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-15 6:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-15 7:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-15 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This mega-patch, on the scale of the importance of the problem, was required
because of gfortran's one pass parsing. It might be a temporary fix because I
am contemplating how an initial pass of contained procedures might be
introduced.
Fixed on mainline.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-15 7:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2023-06-02 8:10 ` [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() ) pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 16:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-03 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-16 10:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 6:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-15 7:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).