public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
       [not found] <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-01 18:00 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-02-10 22:34 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-01 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036

--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The warning for the test in comment #3 has disappeared in GCC 10 (it's still
there in GCC 9).  There are no printf calls with null arguments in the strlen
dump.

GCC 10 still issues a warning for the test in comment #8.  The predicate
analysis might be something to look into for GCC 11.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
       [not found] <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-05-01 18:00 ` [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=] msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-10 22:34 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06  8:30 ` [Bug c/90036] [9/10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-08 12:21 ` [Bug c/90036] [10/11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-10 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|11.0                        |12.0
      Known to fail|9.0                         |10.2.0, 11.0, 9.3.0
   Last reconfirmed|2019-04-10 00:00:00         |2021-2-10

--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No progress in GCC 11 but hopefully in GCC 12.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/90036] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
       [not found] <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-05-01 18:00 ` [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=] msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-02-10 22:34 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-08 12:21 ` [Bug c/90036] [10/11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|12.0                        |12.2

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.2.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/90036] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
       [not found] <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-06  8:30 ` [Bug c/90036] [9/10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-08 12:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-08 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90036

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|12.3                        |12.4

--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.4.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-08 12:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-90036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-01 18:00 ` [Bug c/90036] [8/9/10/11 Regression] false positive: directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=] msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-10 22:34 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06  8:30 ` [Bug c/90036] [9/10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-08 12:21 ` [Bug c/90036] [10/11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).