* [Bug target/90204] [9/10/11/12 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-05-14 9:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [9/10/11/12 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug target/90204] [9/10/11/12 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++ jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug target/90204] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [10/11/12/13 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug target/90204] [9/10/11/12 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++ jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [10/11/12/13 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug target/90204] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 3:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-21 3:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21 5:16 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-10 6:07 ` [Bug target/90204] [11 " law at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-21 3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |11.1.0
Known to work| |12.1.0
Keywords| |needs-bisection
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like compiling with the C front-end was fixed in GCC 12.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [11/12/13/14 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-21 3:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-21 5:16 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-10 6:07 ` [Bug target/90204] [11 " law at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-21 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r12-5390-gd3152981f71eef (Reduce cost of aligned sse register store.) seems to
be the fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug target/90204] [11 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++
[not found] <bug-90204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-21 5:16 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-10 6:07 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-10 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] C |[11 Regression] C code is
|code is optimized worse |optimized worse than C++
|than C++ |
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Per c#21 and c#22.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread