[Bug testsuite/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

[Bug testsuite/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

[hp at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419

--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oops, the second xfail for gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c is wrong and I never
noticed the xpass at the time.  Same for pru-elf and m68k-linux.  Will commit
an update; a revert of that line (of the commit from 2019, see log above).

[Bug testsuite/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c70121c57c544a9afeb842984c9a0a36816c590

commit r13-6367-g5c70121c57c544a9afeb842984c9a0a36816c590
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 27 18:40:02 2023 +0100

    testsuite: Remove xfail gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c RHS !
natural_alignment_32

    Reacting to a long-standing XPASS for CRIS.  This one is
    slightly brown paper-bag level; it was never the here-removed
    xfailed scan that failed and I didn't notice that XPASS when
    reporting success on the commit as a whole.  It's not logical to
    re-read what was just-written even with overlap issues, and I'm
    sure that edit was originally a copy-pasto.  I checked
    historical m68k-linux and pru-elf test-results too, to verify
    that I got that part right.

            PR testsuite/91419
            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c:15 Remove xfail for RHS.