public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken [not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2022-09-01 9:00 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com 2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com 2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2022-09-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242 Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment #9 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> --- Would it be possible to backport this to gcc-9? Linux kernel will start using patchable_function_entry soon, and there are problems with s390x, which this patch fixes as well: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9099057e-124c-8f30-c29d-54be85eeebfd@iogearbox.net/ There is a workaround for now, but it would be good to have this fixed in all the maintained gccs (gcc-8 is no longer maintained as far as I can see, so this leaves only gcc-9). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken [not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com 2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mikpelinux at gmail dot com @ 2022-09-01 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #9) > Would it be possible to backport this to gcc-9? ... > There is a workaround for now, but it would be good to have this fixed in > all the maintained gccs (gcc-8 is no longer maintained as far as I can see, > so this leaves only gcc-9). GCC-9 went EOL with the gcc-9.5.0 release on May 27 this year. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken [not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com 2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com @ 2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2022-09-01 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242 --- Comment #11 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> --- I see. It would be good to update https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/ then - e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/ says "This release series is no longer supported". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-01 12:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com
2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).