public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken
[not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-09-01 9:00 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2022-09-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |iii at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> ---
Would it be possible to backport this to gcc-9?
Linux kernel will start using patchable_function_entry soon, and there are
problems with s390x, which this patch fixes as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9099057e-124c-8f30-c29d-54be85eeebfd@iogearbox.net/
There is a workaround for now, but it would be good to have this fixed in all
the maintained gccs (gcc-8 is no longer maintained as far as I can see, so this
leaves only gcc-9).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken
[not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com
@ 2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mikpelinux at gmail dot com @ 2022-09-01 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #9)
> Would it be possible to backport this to gcc-9?
...
> There is a workaround for now, but it would be good to have this fixed in
> all the maintained gccs (gcc-8 is no longer maintained as far as I can see,
> so this leaves only gcc-9).
GCC-9 went EOL with the gcc-9.5.0 release on May 27 this year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken
[not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com
2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
@ 2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2022-09-01 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93242
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> ---
I see. It would be good to update https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/ then - e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/ says "This release series is no longer supported".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-01 12:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-93242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-09-01 9:00 ` [Bug target/93242] [MIPS] patchable-function-entry broken iii at linux dot ibm.com
2022-09-01 11:47 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2022-09-01 12:20 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).