public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/93914] invalid definition of explicit specialization accepted with just a warning
[not found] <bug-93914-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-10-26 8:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-26 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93914
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2021-10-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is a pedwarn so it turns into an error with -pedantic-errors:
<source>:4:27: error: too many template headers for 'A' (should be 0)
4 | template <> struct A<int> A { }; // invalid
| ^
So confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-10-26 8:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-93914-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-10-26 8:44 ` [Bug c++/93914] invalid definition of explicit specialization accepted with just a warning pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).