public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/93914] invalid definition of explicit specialization accepted with just a warning [not found] <bug-93914-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-10-26 8:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-26 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93914 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2021-10-26 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It is a pedwarn so it turns into an error with -pedantic-errors: <source>:4:27: error: too many template headers for 'A' (should be 0) 4 | template <> struct A<int> A { }; // invalid | ^ So confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-10-26 8:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-93914-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-10-26 8:44 ` [Bug c++/93914] invalid definition of explicit specialization accepted with just a warning pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).