* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-26 10:49 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-11-26 10:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2020-11-26 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201125/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc:45:
error: static assertion failed
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201125/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc:47:
error: static assertion failed
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201125/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc:52:
error: static assertion failed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-26 10:49 ` [Bug libstdc++/98005] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2020-11-26 10:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-26 11:19 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-26 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-26
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks, Andreas.
Patrick, I'm not sure why this fails on m68k. It doesn't necessarily indicate a
bug in the library, just that the test isn't portable to all targets. Not a
priority to look into though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-26 10:49 ` [Bug libstdc++/98005] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-11-26 10:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-26 11:19 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-11-26 11:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2020-11-26 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Objects of type ranges::take_while_view<V, decltype (&pred_f)> or
ranges::transform_view<V, decltype (&func_f)> do have the correct size, though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-26 11:19 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2020-11-26 11:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-11-30 14:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2020-11-26 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Except that those are not the failing assertions.
sizeof(ranges::take_while_view<V, decltype (pred_l)>) and
sizeof(ranges::transform_view<V, decltype (func_l)>) are both 10, probably
because sizeof(pred_l) and sizeof(func_l) are 1, and padding is different.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-26 11:48 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2020-11-30 14:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-30 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-30 14:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-27 11:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-27 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.0 |11.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.1 has been released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-27 11:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-20 13:12 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-28 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.2 |11.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-20 13:12 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-20 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like after r12-4517 the test now compiles successfully on m68k according
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-October/729689.html
Though the test presumably still fails on the 11 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-20 13:12 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.3 |11.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/98005] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors)
2020-11-26 10:32 [Bug libstdc++/98005] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc (test for excess errors) redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-29 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98005
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.4 |11.5
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread