public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:41:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98384-4-3hRH4FWsuN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98384-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> Candidate patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563000.html
thanks!
On Darwin, the test case now builds (checked on a 32b host [powerpc] with a 64b
multilib) and a 64b (x86_64) host. The 32b multilib xfails the execute (as
expected w/out int128 support)
On both powerpc (64b multilib) and x86_64:
test01 fails with :
src-local/gcc-master/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:136:
void test01(): Assertion '!strcmp(to_chars_buffer, printf_buffer+strlen("0x"))'
failed.
(not analysed why yet).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-18 21:39 [Bug libstdc++/98384] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 20:28 ` [Bug libstdc++/98384] " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-22 9:23 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 9:10 ` [Bug libstdc++/98384] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 13:04 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 15:42 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 16:41 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-07 17:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 17:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-08 9:30 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-01-12 16:35 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14 11:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-12 15:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 2:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 16:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 9:58 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-02-24 15:14 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 15:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-02-24 15:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 16:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 16:26 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 16:45 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 17:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-27 16:17 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-27 16:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 14:28 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05 2:37 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 17:42 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 17:53 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2021-03-08 19:27 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 21:09 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 21:24 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-09 9:55 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 14:28 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 14:51 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 15:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 15:22 ` [Bug libstdc++/98384] new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 16:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-98384-4-3hRH4FWsuN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).