public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
@ 2021-01-05 12:42 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:42 ` [Bug c++/98529] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Bug ID: 98529
Summary: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Created attachment 49885
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49885&action=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 32-bit stdio-1_a.H.002l.module
The new g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H test FAILs on Solaris/x86 (only):
+FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++17 scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
+FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2a scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
I'm attaching the .module file.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 12:42 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:42 ` [Bug c++/98529] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 13:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
thanks for the module file. -save-temps output too?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:42 ` [Bug c++/98529] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 13:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09 8:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49889
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49889&action=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 32-bit stdio-1_a.ii
Sure: I just wasn't sure when which was needed. However, without the actual
input, it's hard to do much ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-05 13:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-09 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 12:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-09 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-04-09
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is the problem still present?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-09 8:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-14 12:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-14 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2021-04-09 00:00:00 |2021-4-14
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |*-*-solaris2.11
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, unfortunately. I see it not only on x86 now, but also on sparc:
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++17 scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2a scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2b scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-14 12:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-27 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-27 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.0 |11.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.1 has been released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-27 11:40 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-28 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.2 |11.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-23 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-23 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-23 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-10 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-21 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.3 |11.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-10 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-29 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.4 |11.5
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-29 10:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-10 12:39 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-10 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see it's a common issue on Solaris: instead of the expected
Depset:0 decl entity:204 function_decl:'::fprintf'
as found on Linux, we have
Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf'
What's the best way to handle this: just allow for the alternative form in
the scan-lang-dump?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-10 12:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-05 12:42 [Bug c++/98529] New: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:42 ` [Bug c++/98529] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09 8:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 12:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 8:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-10 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).