public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself
@ 2021-02-10 14:17 vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
2021-02-10 22:21 ` [Bug c++/99059] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: vincent.hamp at higaski dot at @ 2021-02-10 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
Bug ID: 99059
Summary: Static inline variable can't refer to itself
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
Target Milestone: ---
Declaring a static inline member variable and initializing it with a pointer to
itself is currently impossible. The textbook example for such code would
probably be a linked list of some sort:
struct link {
link* next{nullptr};
link* prev{nullptr};
};
struct list {
static inline link tail{&tail, &tail};
};
list l;
Making the member just static and initializing it outside of the class works,
but this kinda breaks my mental model of "static inline" as just being
syntactic sugar. Is this an actual bug or just some overlooked thing in the
standard?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/99059] Static inline variable can't refer to itself
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
@ 2021-02-10 22:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-10 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-10 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-02-10
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/99059] Static inline variable can't refer to itself
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
2021-02-10 22:21 ` [Bug c++/99059] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-10 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-21 0:39 ` ldalessandro at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-10 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like a bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/99059] Static inline variable can't refer to itself
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
2021-02-10 22:21 ` [Bug c++/99059] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-10 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-21 0:39 ` ldalessandro at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 2:57 ` adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 3:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ldalessandro at gmail dot com @ 2021-02-21 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
--- Comment #2 from Luke Dalessandro <ldalessandro at gmail dot com> ---
Ran into this in a static constexpr initializer, not really a workaround for it
that I can find.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/99059] Static inline variable can't refer to itself
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-21 0:39 ` ldalessandro at gmail dot com
@ 2021-12-09 2:57 ` adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 3:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com @ 2021-12-09 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com> ---
Ran into this yesterday and took me a day to figure out what was going on.
Wokrs in clang. Pls fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/99059] Static inline variable can't refer to itself
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-09 2:57 ` adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com
@ 2021-12-09 3:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-09 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99059
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 64989
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64989 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-09 3:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-10 14:17 [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself vincent.hamp at higaski dot at
2021-02-10 22:21 ` [Bug c++/99059] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-10 22:22 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-21 0:39 ` ldalessandro at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 2:57 ` adrianh.bsc at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 3:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).