[Bug target/99083] Big run-time regressions of 519.lbm_r with LTO

["rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99083

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The following ira-color.c piece has heuristics that get triggered differently:

/* Return TRUE if spilling pseudo-registers whose numbers are in array
   REGNOS is better than spilling pseudo-registers with numbers in
   OTHER_REGNOS for reload with given IN and OUT for INSN.  The
   function used by the reload pass to make better register spilling
   decisions.  */
bool
ira_better_spill_reload_regno_p (int *regnos, int *other_regnos,
                                 rtx in, rtx out, rtx_insn *insn)
{
..
#ifdef REG_ALLOC_ORDER
  if (hard_regno >= 0 && other_hard_regno >= 0)
    return (inv_reg_alloc_order[hard_regno]
            < inv_reg_alloc_order[other_hard_regno]);
#else
  if (call_used_count != other_call_used_count)
    return call_used_count > other_call_used_count;
#endif
  return false;
}

it somehow reads to me as if that should have tested HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER
instead?  Not sure how likely it is that we run into this (last) condition.

Interestingly x86 defines ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER.