public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/99529] New: libgfortran I/O: Data races related to new unit / new unit calls for I/O to strings
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:10:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99529

            Bug ID: 99529
           Summary: libgfortran I/O: Data races related to new unit / new
                    unit calls for I/O to strings
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Reported at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-March/055795.html

Using helgrind on a simple omp do loop with write to
a character variable, I get some possible data races
in libgfortran/io/unit.c.

There global array newunits is
allocated and possibly reallocated in
"newunit_alloc". According to the lock outputs from
helgrind I see that this routine is called even if
output is into a character variable.

Routine "newunit_alloc" uses a lock to avoid having several
threads all over the place. But newunit_free also
writes to newunits array. And this routine does not
obtain a lock itself (see comment above newunit_free
in unit.c) So in theory it can happen that newunit_alloc
reallocated newunits, and newunit_free writes to it just
at this time. As I also use 18 threads the initial size of 16
does not suffice and reallocation does probably
indeed happen.

Also access to newunit_lwi is not protected as well
(and complained about by helgrind).

             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10 21:10 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-03-10 21:30 ` [Bug fortran/99529] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11  8:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11  8:52 ` mscfd at gmx dot net
2021-03-11  9:07 ` mscfd at gmx dot net
2021-03-11  9:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11  9:48 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-15 13:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).