public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99927] [11 Regression] Maybe wrong code since r11-39-gf9e1ea10e657af9f
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:44:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99927-4-QS8htoKV1A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It indeed goes wrong in the 105, 107 -> 108 try_combine, but at the start of
that we have:
(insn 105 23 106 6 (set (reg:QI 135)
        (const_int 1 [0x1])) "pr99927.c":13:24 77 {*movqi_internal}
     (nil))
(note 106 105 107 6 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(insn 107 106 108 6 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
        (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 107)
            (const_int 0 [0]))) "pr99927.c":13:24 7 {*cmpsi_ccno_1}
     (nil))
(insn 108 107 111 6 (set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ])
        (if_then_else:QI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
                (const_int 0 [0]))
            (subreg:QI (reg:SI 107) 0)
            (reg:QI 135))) "pr99927.c":13:24 1104 {*movqicc_noc}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 107)
        (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CC 17 flags)
            (nil))))
(insn 111 108 85 6 (set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ])
        (if_then_else:QI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
                (const_int 0 [0]))
            (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ])
            (reg:QI 135))) "pr99927.c":13:24 1104 {*movqicc_noc}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 135)
        (nil)))
(jump_insn 85 111 35 6 (set (pc)
        (if_then_else (ne (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
                (const_int 0 [0]))
            (label_ref 45)
            (pc))) 806 {*jcc}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
        (int_list:REG_BR_PROB 536870916 (nil)))
 -> 45)

The substitutions of 105 and 107 into 108 properly simplify 108 into
(set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ])
    (subreg:QI (reg:SI 107) 0))
because it is:
(set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ])
    (if_then_else:QI (ne (reg:SI 107)
            (const_int 0 [0]))
        (const_int 1 [0x1])
        (const_int 0 [0])))
But what is wrong is that try_combine has been called at all, because
(reg:CCZ 17 flags) is used in 3 instructions rather than just one.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06  8:22 [Bug tree-optimization/99927] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06  8:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99927] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 13:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 14:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 14:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 14:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-04-06 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 15:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 19:59 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 20:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-07 17:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99927] [11 Regression] Wrong " segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-07 17:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-07 18:09 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08  2:39 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 18:00 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-18 15:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-18 15:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/99927] " segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-29 10:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-19 16:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/99927] [9/10 only] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-19 16:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-19 17:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-19 17:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-19 17:16 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99927-4-QS8htoKV1A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).