public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-6464] [Ada] Balance parentheses in comments about allocators
@ 2022-01-11 13:28 Pierre-Marie de Rodat
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat @ 2022-01-11 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13c0bf611a0f8dc73ac5ac463fcc6974eb55ae28
commit r12-6464-g13c0bf611a0f8dc73ac5ac463fcc6974eb55ae28
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date: Wed Jan 5 16:40:44 2022 +0100
[Ada] Balance parentheses in comments about allocators
gcc/ada/
* sem_ch4.adb (Analyze_Allocator): Fix comment.
* sem_eval.ads (Compile-Time Known Values): Likewise.
Diff:
---
gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb | 4 ++--
gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb
index 42547e3b274..c916c215fb8 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch4 is
-- parameters. Note that this is now a static error even if the
-- subprogram is not the main program (this is a change, in an
-- earlier version only the main program was affected, and the
- -- check had to be done in the binder.
+ -- check had to be done in the binder).
if Nkind (P) = N_Subprogram_Body
and then Nkind (Parent (P)) = N_Compilation_Unit
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch4 is
Find_Type (Subtype_Mark (E));
-- Analyze the qualified expression, and apply the name resolution
- -- rule given in 4.7(3).
+ -- rule given in 4.7(3).
Analyze (E);
Type_Id := Etype (E);
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads b/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads
index eb919f17cb4..4fdd5a1fae6 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ package Sem_Eval is
-- The expression 'C' is not static in the technical RM sense, but for many
-- simple record types, the size is in fact known at compile time. When we
-- are trying to perform compile time constant folding (for instance for
- -- expressions like C + 1, Is_Static_Expression or Is_OK_Static_Expression
+ -- expressions like C + 1), Is_Static_Expression or Is_OK_Static_Expression
-- are not the right functions to test if folding is possible. Instead, we
-- use Compile_Time_Known_Value. All static expressions that do not raise
-- constraint error (i.e. those for which Is_OK_Static_Expression is true)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-01-11 13:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-11 13:28 [gcc r12-6464] [Ada] Balance parentheses in comments about allocators Pierre-Marie de Rodat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).