public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gcc mailing list archive stuck?
@ 2003-01-10 17:47 Jonathan Lennox
  2003-01-10 18:23 ` Phil Edwards
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Lennox @ 2003-01-10 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc, gcc-help

Nothing new has appeared on gcc mailing list archive at
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/> since 05:40 yesterday morning.  Has
nothing really been sent to that list, or is the archive stuck?

(I've Cc'd this to gcc-help, which seems to be flowing, in case
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is completely stuck.)

Apologies if this has been reported already.

-- 
Jonathan Lennox
lennox at cs dot columbia dot edu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: gcc mailing list archive stuck?
  2003-01-10 17:47 gcc mailing list archive stuck? Jonathan Lennox
@ 2003-01-10 18:23 ` Phil Edwards
  2003-03-15 19:44   ` Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Phil Edwards @ 2003-01-10 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Lennox; +Cc: gcc, gcc-help

On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:46:52PM -0500, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
> Nothing new has appeared on gcc mailing list archive at
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/> since 05:40 yesterday morning.  Has
> nothing really been sent to that list, or is the archive stuck?

The relevant disk partition filled up.  Things may continue to be wonky
for the next 24 or so hours.

Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
  2003-01-10 18:23 ` Phil Edwards
@ 2003-03-15 19:44   ` Louie Chan
  2003-03-16 19:38     ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Louie Chan @ 2003-03-15 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Phil Edwards, Jonathan Lennox; +Cc: gcc, gcc-help

Dear sir/madam,

Does anyone know if I can use the functions "listen() & accept()" after one successful TCP connection with the function "connect" ?
Please refer to the following concept codes !!

int sockfd, new_connect_fd;

sockfd = socket(domain, type, protocol);
connect(sockfd, sockaddr, addrlen);			<--- connect() and connection successful !
listen(sockfd, backlog);
new_connect_fd =  accept(sockfd, sockaddr, addrlen);	<--- Can the accept() be used after using connect() ?

Thanks for your help !

Best Regards. Louie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
  2003-03-15 19:44   ` Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan
@ 2003-03-16 19:38     ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2003-03-16 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Louie Chan; +Cc: Phil Edwards, Jonathan Lennox, gcc, gcc-help

On Mar 15, 2003, "Louie Chan" <louie@unitednet.com.hk> wrote:

> Does anyone know if I can use the functions "listen() & accept()"
> after one successful TCP connection with the function "connect" ?

This is not a question about GCC, it's a question about whatever C
library you're using on the target system.  You fail to specify which
OS and which C library you're using, so we can't even direct you to
the proper forum in which to ask your question.  Since it pertains to
socket programming, I suppose newsgroups or mailing lists about Unix
network programming might do.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
  2003-01-10 23:45 ask question LLeweLLyn Reese
@ 2003-03-15 21:24 ` Louie Chan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Louie Chan @ 2003-03-15 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LLeweLLyn Reese, lixd; +Cc: gcc-help, lixdfromjx

Dear sir/madam,

Does anyone know if I can use the functions "listen() & accept()" after one successful TCP connection with the function "connect" ?
Please refer to the following concept codes !!

int sockfd, new_connect_fd;

sockfd = socket(domain, type, protocol);
connect(sockfd, sockaddr, addrlen);			<--- connect() and connection successful !
listen(sockfd, backlog);
new_connect_fd =  accept(sockfd, sockaddr, addrlen);	<--- Can the accept() be used after using connect() ?

Thanks for your help !

Best Regards. Louie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-16 19:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-10 17:47 gcc mailing list archive stuck? Jonathan Lennox
2003-01-10 18:23 ` Phil Edwards
2003-03-15 19:44   ` Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan
2003-03-16 19:38     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-10 23:45 ask question LLeweLLyn Reese
2003-03-15 21:24 ` Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).