public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
@ 2022-10-27  3:38 Mark Harmstone
  2022-11-20 16:43 ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Harmstone @ 2022-10-27  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches, martin; +Cc: Mark Harmstone

Changed to double dashes as per
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.

---
 gcc/common.opt      | 4 ++++
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 7 +++++++
 gcc/gcc.cc          | 4 ++++
 gcc/opts.cc         | 3 +++
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index 8a0dafc522d..77103f961d8 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common.opt
@@ -3253,6 +3253,10 @@ gas-locview-support
 Common Driver Var(dwarf2out_as_locview_support)
 Assume assembler support for view in (DWARF2+) .loc directives.
 
+gcodeview
+Common Driver JoinedOrMissing
+Generate debug information in CodeView format.
+
 gcoff
 Common Driver WarnRemoved
 Does nothing.  Preserved for backward compatibility.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index ff6c338bedb..2d29fd2611d 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
 -gstabs  -gstabs+  -gstrict-dwarf  -gno-strict-dwarf @gol
 -gas-loc-support  -gno-as-loc-support @gol
 -gas-locview-support  -gno-as-locview-support @gol
+-gcodeview @gol
 -gcolumn-info  -gno-column-info  -gdwarf32  -gdwarf64 @gol
 -gstatement-frontiers  -gno-statement-frontiers @gol
 -gvariable-location-views  -gno-variable-location-views @gol
@@ -10358,6 +10359,12 @@ assembler (GAS) to fail with an error.
 Produce debugging information in Alpha/VMS debug format (if that is
 supported).  This is the format used by DEBUG on Alpha/VMS systems.
 
+@item -gcodeview
+@opindex gcodeview
+Produce debugging information in CodeView debug format (if that is
+supported).  This is the format used by Microsoft Visual C++ on
+Windows.
+
 @item -g@var{level}
 @itemx -ggdb@var{level}
 @itemx -gstabs@var{level}
diff --git a/gcc/gcc.cc b/gcc/gcc.cc
index bb07cc244e3..d3aa3deeaf7 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc.cc
+++ b/gcc/gcc.cc
@@ -4608,6 +4608,10 @@ driver_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts,
       do_save = false;
       break;
 
+    case OPT_gcodeview:
+      add_infile ("--pdb=", "*");
+      break;
+
     default:
       /* Various driver options need no special processing at this
 	 point, having been handled in a prescan above or being
diff --git a/gcc/opts.cc b/gcc/opts.cc
index 3a89da2dd03..e2633ee5439 100644
--- a/gcc/opts.cc
+++ b/gcc/opts.cc
@@ -3089,6 +3089,9 @@ common_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts,
       set_debug_level (NO_DEBUG, 2, arg, opts, opts_set, loc);
       break;
 
+    case OPT_gcodeview:
+      break;
+
     case OPT_gstabs:
     case OPT_gstabs_:
       set_debug_level (DBX_DEBUG, code == OPT_gstabs_, arg, opts, opts_set,
-- 
2.37.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
  2022-10-27  3:38 [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option Mark Harmstone
@ 2022-11-20 16:43 ` Jeff Law
  2022-11-20 16:54   ` Mark Harmstone
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2022-11-20 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Harmstone, gcc-patches, martin


On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> Changed to double dashes as per
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.

What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't have 
any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems to me 
like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB debug symbols.


Or am I missing something?


jeff



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
  2022-11-20 16:43 ` Jeff Law
@ 2022-11-20 16:54   ` Mark Harmstone
  2023-04-18 19:57     ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Harmstone @ 2022-11-20 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Law, gcc-patches, martin

On 20/11/22 16:43, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>> Changed to double dashes as per
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.
>
> What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't have any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems to me like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB debug symbols.

This isn't useless, as ld will create symbols for the mangled names even without the .debug$S and .debug$T sections being present.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
  2022-11-20 16:54   ` Mark Harmstone
@ 2023-04-18 19:57     ` Jeff Law
  2023-04-18 20:32       ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2023-04-18 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Harmstone, gcc-patches, martin



On 11/20/22 09:54, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> On 20/11/22 16:43, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>>> Changed to double dashes as per
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.
>>
>> What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't have 
>> any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems to me 
>> like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB debug symbols.
> 
> This isn't useless, as ld will create symbols for the mangled names even 
> without the .debug$S and .debug$T sections being present.
Sorry this didn't get resolved for gcc-13.  The good news is I have 
committed your V2 patch into the trunk for gcc-14.

Thanks for your patience,
jeff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
  2023-04-18 19:57     ` Jeff Law
@ 2023-04-18 20:32       ` Jason Merrill
  2023-04-18 20:51         ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-04-18 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Law, Mark Harmstone, gcc-patches, martin

On 4/18/23 15:57, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/20/22 09:54, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>> On 20/11/22 16:43, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>>>> Changed to double dashes as per
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.
>>>
>>> What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't have 
>>> any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems to me 
>>> like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB debug symbols.
>>
>> This isn't useless, as ld will create symbols for the mangled names 
>> even without the .debug$S and .debug$T sections being present.

> Sorry this didn't get resolved for gcc-13.  The good news is I have 
> committed your V2 patch into the trunk for gcc-14.

FYI I've removed the stray obsolete @gol that broke building the docs.

Jason


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option
  2023-04-18 20:32       ` Jason Merrill
@ 2023-04-18 20:51         ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2023-04-18 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Merrill, Mark Harmstone, gcc-patches, martin



On 4/18/23 14:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/18/23 15:57, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/22 09:54, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>>> On 20/11/22 16:43, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>>>>> Changed to double dashes as per
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html.
>>>>
>>>> What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't 
>>>> have any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems 
>>>> to me like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB 
>>>> debug symbols.
>>>
>>> This isn't useless, as ld will create symbols for the mangled names 
>>> even without the .debug$S and .debug$T sections being present.
> 
>> Sorry this didn't get resolved for gcc-13.  The good news is I have 
>> committed your V2 patch into the trunk for gcc-14.
> 
> FYI I've removed the stray obsolete @gol that broke building the docs.
Thanks.  I didn't realize those were obsolete.

jeff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-18 20:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-27  3:38 [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option Mark Harmstone
2022-11-20 16:43 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-20 16:54   ` Mark Harmstone
2023-04-18 19:57     ` Jeff Law
2023-04-18 20:32       ` Jason Merrill
2023-04-18 20:51         ` Jeff Law

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).