From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: "Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [AArch64] Enable generation of FRINTNZ instructions
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:19:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cdffce8-e0e5-3304-52b9-3b736a4d380d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2211071055240.4294@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
On 07/11/2022 11:05, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay, just been reminded I still had this patch outstanding
>> from last stage 1. Hopefully since it has been mostly reviewed it could go in
>> for this stage 1?
>>
>> I addressed the comments and gave the slp-part of vectorizable_call some TLC
>> to make it work.
>>
>> I also changed vect_get_slp_defs as I noticed that the call from
>> vectorizable_call was creating an auto_vec with 'nargs' that might be less
>> than the number of children in the slp_node
> how so? Please fix that in the caller. It looks like it probably
> shoud use vect_nargs instead?
Well that was my first intuition, but when I looked at it further the
variant it's calling:
void vect_get_slp_defs (vec_info *, slp_tree slp_node, vec<vec<tree> >
*vec_oprnds, unsigned n)
Is actually creating a vector of vectors of slp defs. So for each child
of slp_node it calls:
void vect_get_slp_defs (slp_tree slp_node, vec<tree> *vec_defs)
Which returns a vector of vectorized defs. So vect_nargs would be the
right size for the inner vec<tree> of vec_defs, but the outer should
have the same number of elements as the original slp_node has children.
However, at the call site (vectorizable_call), the operand we pass to
vect_get_slp_defs 'vec_defs', is initialized before the code-path is
specialized for slp_node. I'll go see if I can change the call site to
not have to do that, given the continue at the end of the if (slp_node)
BB I don't think it needs to use vec_defs after it, but it may require
some massaging to be able to define it separately for each code-path.
>
>> , so that quick_push might not be
>> safe as is, so I added the reserve (n) to ensure it's safe to push. I didn't
>> actually come across any failure because of it though. Happy to split this
>> into a separate patch if needed.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
> I'll leave final approval to Richard but
>
> - This only needs 1 bit, but occupies the full 16 to ensure a nice
> + This only needs 1 bit, but occupies the full 15 to ensure a nice
> layout. */
> unsigned int vectorizable : 16;
>
> you don't actually change the width of the bitfield. I would find
> it more natural to have
>
> signed int type0 : 7;
> signed int type0_vtrans : 1;
> signed int type1 : 7;
> signed int type1_vtrans : 1;
>
> with typeN_vtrans specifying how the types transform when vectorized.
> I would imagine another variant we could need is narrow/widen
> according to either result or other argument type? That said,
> just your flag would then be
>
> signed int type0 : 7;
> signed int pad : 1;
> signed int type1 : 7;
> signed int type1_vect_as_scalar : 1;
>
> ?
That's a cool idea! I'll leave it as a single bit for now like that, if
we want to re-use it for multiple transformations we will obviously need
to rename & give it more bits.
>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (ftrunc<mode><frintnz_mode>2): New
>> pattern.
>> * config/aarch64/iterators.md (FRINTNZ): New iterator.
>> (frintnz_mode): New int attribute.
>> (VSFDF): Make iterator conditional.
>> * internal-fn.def (FTRUNC_INT): New IFN.
>> * internal-fn.cc (ftrunc_int_direct): New define.
>> (expand_ftrunc_int_optab_fn): New custom expander.
>> (direct_ftrunc_int_optab_supported_p): New supported_p.
>> * internal-fn.h (direct_internal_fn_info): Add new member
>> type1_is_scalar_p.
>> * match.pd: Add to the existing TRUNC pattern match.
>> * optabs.def (ftrunc_int): New entry.
>> * stor-layout.h (element_precision): Moved from here...
>> * tree.h (element_precision): ... to here.
>> (element_type): New declaration.
>> * tree.cc (element_type): New function.
>> (element_precision): Changed to use element_type.
>> * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vectorizable_internal_function): Add
>> support for
>> IFNs with different input types.
>> (vect_get_scalar_oprnds): New function.
>> (vectorizable_call): Teach to handle IFN_FTRUNC_INT.
>> * tree-vect-slp.cc (check_scalar_arg_ok): New function.
>> (vect_slp_analyze_node_operations): Use check_scalar_arg_ok.
>> (vect_get_slp_defs): Ensure vec_oprnds has enough slots to push.
>> * doc/md.texi: New entry for ftrunc pattern name.
>> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (aarch64_frintzx_ok): New target.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/merge_trunc1.c: Adapted to skip if frintnz
>> instructions available.
>> * lib/target-supports.exp: Added aarch64_frintnzx_ok target and
>> aarch64_frintz options.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/frintnz.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/frintnz_vec.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/frintnz_slp.c: New test.
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 17:51 Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-12 10:56 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-12 11:48 ` Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
2021-11-16 12:10 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-17 13:30 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-17 15:38 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-18 11:05 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-22 11:38 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-22 11:41 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-25 13:53 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-07 11:29 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-17 12:44 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-12-29 15:55 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-29 16:54 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-01-03 12:18 ` Richard Biener
2022-01-10 14:09 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-01-10 14:45 ` Richard Biener
2022-01-14 10:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-04 17:40 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-07 11:05 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-07 14:19 ` Andre Vieira (lists) [this message]
2022-11-07 14:56 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-09 11:33 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-15 18:24 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-16 12:25 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-29 11:17 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1cdffce8-e0e5-3304-52b9-3b736a4d380d@arm.com \
--to=andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).