public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Andre Simoes Dias Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [AArch64] Enable generation of FRINTNZ instructions
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:10:36 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <653o8886-3p5n-sr82-9n83-71q33o8824@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36e3469a-3922-d49e-4006-0088eac29157@arm.com>

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Andre Simoes Dias Vieira wrote:

> 
> On 12/11/2021 10:56, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch introduces two IFN's FTRUNC32 and FTRUNC64, the corresponding
> >> optabs and mappings. It also creates a backend pattern to implement them
> >> for
> >> aarch64 and a match.pd pattern to idiom recognize these.
> >> These IFN's (and optabs) represent a truncation towards zero, as if
> >> performed
> >> by first casting it to a signed integer of 32 or 64 bits and then back to
> >> the
> >> same floating point type/mode.
> >>
> >> The match.pd pattern choses to use these, when supported, regardless of
> >> trapping math, since these new patterns mimic the original behavior of
> >> truncating through an integer.
> >>
> >> I didn't think any of the existing IFN's represented these. I know it's a
> >> bit
> >> late in stage 1, but I thought this might be OK given it's only used by a
> >> single target and should have very little impact on anything else.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped on aarch64-none-linux.
> >>
> >> OK for trunk?
> > On the RTL side ftrunc32/ftrunc64 would probably be better a conversion
> > optab (with two modes), so not
> >
> > +OPTAB_D (ftrunc32_optab, "ftrunc$asi2")
> > +OPTAB_D (ftrunc64_optab, "ftrunc$adi2")
> >
> > but
> >
> > OPTAB_CD (ftrunc_shrt_optab, "ftrunc$a$I$b2")
> >
> > or so?  I know that gets somewhat awkward for the internal function,
> > but IMHO we shouldn't tie our hands because of that?
> I tried doing this originally, but indeed I couldn't find a way to correctly
> tie the internal function to it.
> 
> direct_optab_supported_p with multiple types expect those to be of the same
> mode. I see convert_optab_supported_p does but I don't know how that is
> used...
> 
> Any ideas?

No "nice" ones.  The "usual" way is to provide fake arguments that
specify the type/mode.  We could use an integer argument directly
secifying the mode (then the IL would look host dependent - ugh),
or specify a constant zero in the intended mode (less visibly
obvious - but at least with -gimple dumping you'd see the type...).

In any case if people think going with two optabs is OK then
please consider using ftruncsi and ftruncdi instead of 32/64.

Richard.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-11 17:51 Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-12 10:56 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-12 11:48   ` Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
2021-11-16 12:10     ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-11-17 13:30       ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-17 15:38         ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-18 11:05         ` Richard Biener
2021-11-22 11:38           ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-11-22 11:41             ` Richard Biener
2021-11-25 13:53               ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-07 11:29                 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-17 12:44                 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-12-29 15:55                   ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2021-12-29 16:54                     ` Richard Sandiford
2022-01-03 12:18                     ` Richard Biener
2022-01-10 14:09                       ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-01-10 14:45                         ` Richard Biener
2022-01-14 10:37                         ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-04 17:40                           ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-07 11:05                             ` Richard Biener
2022-11-07 14:19                               ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-07 14:56                                 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-09 11:33                                   ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-15 18:24                                 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-16 12:25                                   ` Richard Biener
2021-11-29 11:17           ` Andre Vieira (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=653o8886-3p5n-sr82-9n83-71q33o8824@fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).