public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Neumann <thomas.neumann@in.tum.de>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, markus.boeck02@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] release the sorted FDE array when deregistering a frame [PR109685]
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 16:32:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f18e946-c88f-f5dc-92d3-6b7171fcc626@in.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfibqu1s.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

The atomic fastpath bypasses the code that releases the sort
array which was lazily allocated during unwinding. We now
check after deregistering if there is an array to free.

libgcc/ChangeLog:
	* unwind-dw2-fde.c: Free sort array in atomic fast path.
---
  libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c | 6 ++++++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c b/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
index 7b74c391ced..4d2737ff9f7 100644
--- a/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
+++ b/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
@@ -240,6 +240,12 @@ __deregister_frame_info_bases (const void *begin)

    // And remove
    ob = btree_remove (&registered_frames, range[0]);
+
+  // Deallocate the sort array if any.
+  if (ob && ob->s.b.sorted)
+    {
+      free (ob->u.sort);
+    }
  #else
    init_object_mutex_once ();
    __gthread_mutex_lock (&object_mutex);
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16 10:19 [PATCH v4] eliminate mutex in fast path of __register_frame Thomas Neumann
2022-09-16 14:49 ` Jason Merrill
2022-09-18  8:59 ` Dimitar Dimitrov
2022-09-18  9:20   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-18 10:02   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-19 13:46 ` Stephan Bergmann
2022-09-19 13:55   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-19 14:00     ` Stephan Bergmann
2022-09-19 15:33   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-20  5:39     ` Stephan Bergmann
2022-11-21 11:14 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-21 11:22   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-11-21 11:48     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-21 17:13       ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-22  0:31         ` Thomas Neumann
2022-11-22  8:20           ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-22  9:12             ` Thomas Neumann
2022-12-09 17:34             ` [PATCH] initialize fde objects lazily Thomas Neumann
2022-12-15 16:11               ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-16 17:25               ` Jason Merrill
2023-05-02 14:32             ` Thomas Neumann [this message]
2023-05-10 10:49             ` [PATCH] fix radix sort on 32bit platforms [PR109670] Thomas Neumann
2023-08-10 11:33             ` [PATCH] preserve base pointer for __deregister_frame [PR110956] Thomas Neumann
2023-08-11 15:21               ` Jeff Law
2024-03-15 10:29             ` [PATCH] handle unwind tables that are embedded within unwinding code, [PR111731] Thomas Neumann
2024-03-20  8:25               ` Richard Biener
2024-03-22 13:35               ` Jeff Law
2024-03-22 13:36               ` Jeff Law
2024-03-22 14:43                 ` Thomas Neumann
2022-11-22  8:00         ` [PATCH] speed up end_fde_sort using radix sort Thomas Neumann
2022-12-16 18:02           ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-21 11:49     ` [PATCH v4] eliminate mutex in fast path of __register_frame Tamar Christina
2022-11-21 11:53       ` Thomas Neumann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f18e946-c88f-f5dc-92d3-6b7171fcc626@in.tum.de \
    --to=thomas.neumann@in.tum.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=markus.boeck02@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).