From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000/test: Fix bswap64-4.c with has_arch_ppc64 [PR106680]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:07:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831210750.GV25951@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afff5a36-ff23-cb1c-66f9-3b828f9b32f6@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:53:07PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/31/22 2:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:00:14PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Right, but haven't the 64-bit Linux kernels been fixed forever to always
> save/restore the full 64-bit hardware registers on a context switch/signal?
The kernel has. But there are user space things (glibc) that haven't
been fixed, and those are default as well.
> If not, them this whole thing is moot and the current behavior of disabling
> -mpower64 if we use -m32 later on the command line is the correct thing to do.
The kernel has no way of disabling -mpowerpc64. The instructions are
valid on any CPU that supports them, whether SF=1 or SF=0.
> > But we should not enable -mpowerpc64 on 32-bit Linux by default.
>
> I didn't imply we should do that. I was only agreeing with you that
> we should try not disabling an explicit -mpowerpc64 when -m32 is used
> later on the command line.
Okay, glad we agree :-)
> I only meant to say is that the code in rs6000_option_override_internal() is what
> seems to remove the OPTION_MASK_POWERPC64 from our cpu mask when -m32 is used
> later on the command line... and that is controlled by OS_MISSING_POWERPC64.
This is the default mask only here.
> Changing OS_MISSING_POWERPC64 as I mentioned would not add OPTION_MASK_POWERPC64
> to our cpu masks when -m32 is used.
So you say this is where the bug is?
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 9:33 Kewen.Lin
2022-08-31 14:13 ` Peter Bergner
2022-09-01 8:57 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-01 14:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-02 0:50 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-02 17:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-05 2:25 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-08-31 15:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-08-31 15:48 ` Peter Bergner
2022-08-31 16:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-08-31 17:00 ` Peter Bergner
2022-08-31 19:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-08-31 19:53 ` Peter Bergner
2022-08-31 21:07 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-08-31 21:38 ` Peter Bergner
2022-08-31 21:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-08-31 22:17 ` Peter Bergner
2022-09-01 9:05 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-01 15:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-02 0:51 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-02 17:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-05 2:35 ` Kewen.Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220831210750.GV25951@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).