public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>,
	Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Subject: [COMMITTED] Remove assert from set_nonzero_bits.
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2022 19:52:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221004175221.1493497-1-aldyh@redhat.com> (raw)

The assert removed by this patch was there to keep users from passing
masks of incompatible types.  The self tests are passing host wide
ints down (set_nonzero_bits (-1)), which seem to be 32 bits, whereas
some embedded targets have integer_type_node's of 16-bits.  This is
causing problems in m32c-elf, among others.

I suppose there's no harm in passing a 32-bit mask, because
set_nonzero_bits calls wide_int::from() to convert the mask to the
appropriate type.  So we can remove the assert.

Sorry for the pain Jeff.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* value-range.cc (irange::set_nonzero_bits): Remove assert.
---
 gcc/value-range.cc | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index afb26a40083..a307559b654 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -2913,7 +2913,6 @@ irange::set_nonzero_bits (const wide_int_ref &bits)
 {
   gcc_checking_assert (!undefined_p ());
   unsigned prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type ());
-  gcc_checking_assert (prec == bits.get_precision ());
 
   // Drop VARYINGs with a nonzero mask to a plain range.
   if (m_kind == VR_VARYING && bits != -1)
-- 
2.37.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-04 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-04 17:52 Aldy Hernandez [this message]
2022-10-04 18:45 ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221004175221.1493497-1-aldyh@redhat.com \
    --to=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).