[PATCH] LoongArch: fix signed overflow in loongarch_emit_int_compare

[PATCH] LoongArch: fix signed overflow in loongarch_emit_int_compare

[Xi Ruoyao]

Signed overflow is an undefined behavior, so we need to prevent it from
happening, instead of "checking" the result.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_emit_int_compare):
	Avoid signed overflow.
---

Bootstrapped and regtested on loongarch64-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?

 gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
index f54c233f90c..032fb1474c7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
@@ -4175,13 +4175,14 @@ loongarch_emit_int_compare (enum rtx_code *code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
 	      HOST_WIDE_INT new_rhs;
 	      bool increment = *code == mag_comparisons[i][0];
 	      bool decrement = *code == mag_comparisons[i][1];
-	      if (!increment && !decrement)
+	      if ((!increment && !decrement)
+		  || (increment && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX)
+		  || (decrement && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MIN))
 		continue;
 
 	      new_rhs = rhs + (increment ? 1 : -1);
 	      if (loongarch_integer_cost (new_rhs)
-		    < loongarch_integer_cost (rhs)
-		  && (rhs < 0) == (new_rhs < 0))
+		    < loongarch_integer_cost (rhs))
 		{
 		  *op1 = GEN_INT (new_rhs);
 		  *code = mag_comparisons[i][increment];
-- 
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: fix signed overflow in loongarch_emit_int_compare

[Lulu Cheng]

在 2022/11/4 下午2:39, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> Signed overflow is an undefined behavior, so we need to prevent it from
> happening, instead of "checking" the result.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_emit_int_compare):
> 	Avoid signed overflow.
> ---
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on loongarch64-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?
>
>   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> index f54c233f90c..032fb1474c7 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> @@ -4175,13 +4175,14 @@ loongarch_emit_int_compare (enum rtx_code *code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
>   	      HOST_WIDE_INT new_rhs;
>   	      bool increment = *code == mag_comparisons[i][0];
>   	      bool decrement = *code == mag_comparisons[i][1];
> -	      if (!increment && !decrement)
> +	      if ((!increment && !decrement)
> +		  || (increment && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX)
> +		  || (decrement && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MIN))
>   		continue;

I think it should be here:

              if (!increment && !decrement)
                 continue;

+             if ((increment && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX)
+                 || (decrement && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MIN))
+               break;
+

It is not necessary to continue when *code matches one of 
mag_comparisons[i].

>   
>   	      new_rhs = rhs + (increment ? 1 : -1);
>   	      if (loongarch_integer_cost (new_rhs)
> -		    < loongarch_integer_cost (rhs)
> -		  && (rhs < 0) == (new_rhs < 0))
> +		    < loongarch_integer_cost (rhs))
>   		{
>   		  *op1 = GEN_INT (new_rhs);
>   		  *code = mag_comparisons[i][increment];

Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: fix signed overflow in loongarch_emit_int_compare

[Xi Ruoyao]

On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 09:46 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> I think it should be here:
> 
>               if (!increment && !decrement)
>                  continue;
> 
> +             if ((increment && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX)
> +                 || (decrement && rhs == HOST_WIDE_INT_MIN))
> +               break;
> +
> 
> It is not necessary to continue when *code matches one of 
> mag_comparisons[i].

Ah yes, I misread the code :(.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University