public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fei Gao <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jeffreyalaw@gmail.com, kito.cheng@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	Fei Gao <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2022 10:03:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221201100332.22226-3-gaofei@eswincomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201100332.22226-1-gaofei@eswincomputing.com>

The stack that save-restore reserves is not well accumulated in stack allocation and deallocation.
This patch allows less instructions to be used in stack allocation and deallocation if save-restore enabled.

before patch:
  bar:
    call	t0,__riscv_save_4
    addi	sp,sp,-64
    ...
    li	t0,-12288
    addi	t0,t0,-1968 # optimized out after patch
    add	sp,sp,t0 # prologue
    ...
    li	t0,12288 # epilogue
    addi	t0,t0,2000 # optimized out after patch
    add	sp,sp,t0
    ...
    addi	sp,sp,32
    tail	__riscv_restore_4

after patch:
  bar:
    call	t0,__riscv_save_4
    addi	sp,sp,-2032
    ...
    li	t0,-12288
    add	sp,sp,t0 # prologue
    ...
    li	t0,12288 # epilogue
    add	sp,sp,t0
    ...
    addi	sp,sp,2032
    tail	__riscv_restore_4

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_prologue): consider save-restore in stack allocation.
        (riscv_expand_epilogue): consider save-restore in stack deallocation.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                     | 50 ++++++++++---------
 .../gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c     | 40 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index f0bbcd6d6be..a50f2303032 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -5010,12 +5010,12 @@ void
 riscv_expand_prologue (void)
 {
   struct riscv_frame_info *frame = &cfun->machine->frame;
-  poly_int64 size = frame->total_size;
+  poly_int64 remaining_size = frame->total_size;
   unsigned mask = frame->mask;
   rtx insn;
 
   if (flag_stack_usage_info)
-    current_function_static_stack_size = constant_lower_bound (size);
+    current_function_static_stack_size = constant_lower_bound (remaining_size);
 
   if (cfun->machine->naked_p)
     return;
@@ -5026,7 +5026,7 @@ riscv_expand_prologue (void)
       rtx dwarf = NULL_RTX;
       dwarf = riscv_adjust_libcall_cfi_prologue ();
 
-      size -= frame->save_libcall_adjustment;
+      remaining_size -= frame->save_libcall_adjustment;
       insn = emit_insn (riscv_gen_gpr_save_insn (frame));
       frame->mask = 0; /* Temporarily fib that we need not save GPRs.  */
 
@@ -5037,16 +5037,14 @@ riscv_expand_prologue (void)
   /* Save the registers.  */
   if ((frame->mask | frame->fmask) != 0)
     {
-      HOST_WIDE_INT step1 = riscv_first_stack_step (frame, frame->total_size);
-      if (size.is_constant ())
-	step1 = MIN (size.to_constant(), step1);
+      HOST_WIDE_INT step1 = riscv_first_stack_step (frame, remaining_size);
 
       insn = gen_add3_insn (stack_pointer_rtx,
 			    stack_pointer_rtx,
 			    GEN_INT (-step1));
       RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (emit_insn (insn)) = 1;
-      size -= step1;
-      riscv_for_each_saved_reg (size, riscv_save_reg, false, false);
+      remaining_size -= step1;
+      riscv_for_each_saved_reg (remaining_size, riscv_save_reg, false, false);
     }
 
   frame->mask = mask; /* Undo the above fib.  */
@@ -5055,29 +5053,29 @@ riscv_expand_prologue (void)
   if (frame_pointer_needed)
     {
       insn = gen_add3_insn (hard_frame_pointer_rtx, stack_pointer_rtx,
-			    GEN_INT ((frame->hard_frame_pointer_offset - size).to_constant ()));
+			    GEN_INT ((frame->hard_frame_pointer_offset - remaining_size).to_constant ()));
       RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (emit_insn (insn)) = 1;
 
       riscv_emit_stack_tie ();
     }
 
   /* Allocate the rest of the frame.  */
-  if (known_gt (size, 0))
+  if (known_gt (remaining_size, 0))
     {
       /* Two step adjustment:
 	 1.scalable frame. 2.constant frame.  */
       poly_int64 scalable_frame (0, 0);
-      if (!size.is_constant ())
+      if (!remaining_size.is_constant ())
 	{
 	  /* First for scalable frame.  */
-	  poly_int64 scalable_frame = size;
-	  scalable_frame.coeffs[0] = size.coeffs[1];
+	  poly_int64 scalable_frame = remaining_size;
+	  scalable_frame.coeffs[0] = remaining_size.coeffs[1];
 	  riscv_v_adjust_scalable_frame (stack_pointer_rtx, scalable_frame, false);
-	  size -= scalable_frame;
+	  remaining_size -= scalable_frame;
 	}
 
       /* Second step for constant frame.  */
-      HOST_WIDE_INT constant_frame = size.to_constant ();
+      HOST_WIDE_INT constant_frame = remaining_size.to_constant ();
       if (constant_frame == 0)
 	return;
 
@@ -5142,6 +5140,8 @@ riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
   HOST_WIDE_INT step2 = 0;
   bool use_restore_libcall = ((style == NORMAL_RETURN)
 			      && riscv_use_save_libcall (frame));
+  unsigned libcall_size = use_restore_libcall ?
+                            frame->save_libcall_adjustment : 0;
   rtx ra = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, RETURN_ADDR_REGNUM);
   rtx insn;
 
@@ -5212,13 +5212,18 @@ riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
       REG_NOTES (insn) = dwarf;
     }
 
+  if (use_restore_libcall)
+    frame->mask = 0; /* Temporarily fib for GPRs.  */
+
   /* If we need to restore registers, deallocate as much stack as
      possible in the second step without going out of range.  */
   if ((frame->mask | frame->fmask) != 0)
-    {
-      step2 = riscv_first_stack_step (frame, frame->total_size);
-      step1 -= step2;
-    }
+    step2 = riscv_first_stack_step (frame, frame->total_size - libcall_size);
+
+  if (use_restore_libcall)
+    frame->mask = mask; /* Undo the above fib.  */
+
+  step1 -= step2 + libcall_size;
 
   /* Set TARGET to BASE + STEP1.  */
   if (known_gt (step1, 0))
@@ -5272,15 +5277,12 @@ riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
     frame->mask = 0; /* Temporarily fib that we need not save GPRs.  */
 
   /* Restore the registers.  */
-  riscv_for_each_saved_reg (frame->total_size - step2, riscv_restore_reg,
+  riscv_for_each_saved_reg (frame->total_size - step2 - libcall_size,
+                            riscv_restore_reg,
 			    true, style == EXCEPTION_RETURN);
 
   if (use_restore_libcall)
-    {
       frame->mask = mask; /* Undo the above fib.  */
-      gcc_assert (step2 >= frame->save_libcall_adjustment);
-      step2 -= frame->save_libcall_adjustment;
-    }
 
   if (need_barrier_p)
     riscv_emit_stack_tie ();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..522e706cfbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore.c
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32imafc -mabi=ilp32f -msave-restore -O2 -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2 -fno-unroll-loops -fno-peel-loops -fno-lto" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */
+
+char my_getchar();
+float getf();
+
+/*
+**bar:
+**	call	t0,__riscv_save_4
+**	addi	sp,sp,-2032
+**	...
+**	li	t0,-12288
+**	add	sp,sp,t0
+**	...
+**	li	t0,12288
+**	add	sp,sp,t0
+**	...
+**	addi	sp,sp,2032
+**	tail	__riscv_restore_4
+*/
+int bar()
+{
+  float volatile farray[3568];
+
+  float sum = 0;
+  float f1 = getf();
+  float f2 = getf();
+  float f3 = getf();
+  float f4 = getf();
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < 3568; i++)
+  {
+    farray[i] = my_getchar() * 1.2;
+    sum += farray[i];
+  }
+
+  return sum + f1 + f2 + f3 + f4;
+}
+
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-01 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-01 10:03 [PATCH 0/3] " Fei Gao
2022-12-01 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: add a new parameter in riscv_first_stack_step Fei Gao
2023-02-03  8:52   ` [PING][PATCH " Fei Gao
2023-04-16 16:40   ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2023-04-17 18:09   ` Jeff Law
2022-12-01 10:03 ` Fei Gao [this message]
2023-02-03  8:52   ` [PING] [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore Fei Gao
2023-04-16 16:45   ` Jeff Law
2023-04-17 22:51   ` Jeff Law
2022-12-01 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: make the stack manipulation codes more readable Fei Gao
2023-02-03  8:52   ` [PING] " Fei Gao
2023-04-18  0:14   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-03  8:52 ` [PING] [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore Fei Gao
2023-02-09  2:21   ` [PING 2] " Fei Gao
2023-02-16  7:17   ` Fei Gao
2023-02-16 14:39     ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221201100332.22226-3-gaofei@eswincomputing.com \
    --to=gaofei@eswincomputing.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).