[PING] [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: make the stack manipulation codes more readable.

["Fei Gao" <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>]

Gentle ping.

The patch I previously submitted:
| Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:38:08 -0800
| Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
| Message-ID: <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>

I split the patches as per Palmer's review comment.

BR
Fei

>gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_first_stack_step): make codes more readable.
>        (riscv_expand_epilogue): likewise.
>---
> gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
>index a50f2303032..95da08ffb3b 100644
>--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
>+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
>@@ -4926,8 +4926,11 @@ riscv_first_stack_step (struct riscv_frame_info *frame, poly_int64 remaining_siz
>   if (SMALL_OPERAND (remaining_const_size))
>     return remaining_const_size;
>
>+  poly_int64 callee_saved_first_step =
>+    remaining_size - frame->frame_pointer_offset;
>+  gcc_assert(callee_saved_first_step.is_constant ());
>   HOST_WIDE_INT min_first_step =
>-    riscv_stack_align ((remaining_size - frame->frame_pointer_offset).to_constant());
>+    riscv_stack_align (callee_saved_first_step.to_constant ());
>   HOST_WIDE_INT max_first_step = IMM_REACH / 2 - PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY / 8;
>   HOST_WIDE_INT min_second_step = remaining_const_size - max_first_step;
>   gcc_assert (min_first_step <= max_first_step);
>@@ -4935,7 +4938,7 @@ riscv_first_stack_step (struct riscv_frame_info *frame, poly_int64 remaining_siz
>   /* As an optimization, use the least-significant bits of the total frame
>      size, so that the second adjustment step is just LUI + ADD.  */
>   if (!SMALL_OPERAND (min_second_step)
>-      && remaining_const_size % IMM_REACH < IMM_REACH / 2
>+      && remaining_const_size % IMM_REACH <= max_first_step
>       && remaining_const_size % IMM_REACH >= min_first_step)
>     return remaining_const_size % IMM_REACH;
>
>@@ -5129,14 +5132,14 @@ riscv_adjust_libcall_cfi_epilogue ()
> void
> riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
> {
>-  /* Split the frame into two.  STEP1 is the amount of stack we should
>-     deallocate before restoring the registers.  STEP2 is the amount we
>-     should deallocate afterwards.
>+  /* Split the frame into 3 steps. STEP1 is the amount of stack we should
>+     deallocate before restoring the registers. STEP2 is the amount we
>+     should deallocate afterwards including the callee saved regs. STEP3
>+     is the amount deallocated by save-restore libcall.
>
>      Start off by assuming that no registers need to be restored.  */
>   struct riscv_frame_info *frame = &cfun->machine->frame;
>   unsigned mask = frame->mask;
>-  poly_int64 step1 = frame->total_size;
>   HOST_WIDE_INT step2 = 0;
>   bool use_restore_libcall = ((style == NORMAL_RETURN)
>       && riscv_use_save_libcall (frame));
>@@ -5223,7 +5226,7 @@ riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
>   if (use_restore_libcall)
>     frame->mask = mask; /* Undo the above fib.  */
>
>-  step1 -= step2 + libcall_size;
>+  poly_int64 step1 = frame->total_size - step2 - libcall_size;
>
>   /* Set TARGET to BASE + STEP1.  */
>   if (known_gt (step1, 0))
>--
>2.17.1