* [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp
@ 2023-07-07 7:51 Christophe Lyon
2023-07-07 7:51 ` [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets Christophe Lyon
2023-07-10 13:47 ` [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Kyrylo Tkachov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Lyon @ 2023-07-07 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, Kyrylo.Tkachov, richard.earnshaw; +Cc: Christophe Lyon
The arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp family of effective targets was not
documented when it was introduced.
2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
gcc/
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp): Document.
---
gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 526020c7511..03fb2394705 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
@@ -2190,6 +2190,12 @@ ARM target supports options to generate instructions from ARMv8.1-M with
the Custom Datapath Extension (CDE) and M-Profile Vector Extension (MVE).
Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options.
+@item arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp
+ARM target supports options to generate instructions from ARMv8.1-M
+with the Custom Datapath Extension (CDE) and M-Profile Vector
+Extension (MVE) with floating-point support. Some multilibs may be
+incompatible with these options.
+
@item arm_pacbti_hw
Test system supports executing Pointer Authentication and Branch Target
Identification instructions.
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets
2023-07-07 7:51 [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Christophe Lyon
@ 2023-07-07 7:51 ` Christophe Lyon
2023-07-10 13:45 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-07-10 13:47 ` [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Kyrylo Tkachov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Lyon @ 2023-07-07 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, Kyrylo.Tkachov, richard.earnshaw; +Cc: Christophe Lyon
For arm targets, we generate many effective-targets with
check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib and
check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib which check if we can
link and execute a simple program with a given set of flags/multilibs.
In some cases however, it's possible to link but not to execute a
program, so this patch adds similar _link effective-targets which only
check if link succeeds.
The patch does not uupdate the documentation as it already lacks the
numerous existing related effective-targets.
2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp (arm_*FUNC_link): New effective-targets.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index c04db2be7f9..d33bc077418 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -5129,6 +5129,14 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdefs } {
return "$flags FLAG"
}
+ proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_link { } {
+ return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_arch_FUNC_link executable {
+ #include <stdint.h>
+ int dummy;
+ int main (void) { return 0; }
+ } [add_options_for_arm_arch_FUNC ""]]
+ }
+
proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib { } {
return [check_runtime arm_arch_FUNC_multilib {
int
@@ -5906,6 +5914,7 @@ proc add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon { flags } {
# arm_v8m_main_cde: Armv8-m CDE (Custom Datapath Extension).
# arm_v8m_main_cde_fp: Armv8-m CDE with FP registers.
# arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE.
+# arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE with FP support.
# Usage:
# /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8m_main_cde_ok } */
# /* { dg-add-options arm_v8m_main_cde } */
@@ -5965,6 +5974,24 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdef arminc } {
return "$flags $et_FUNC_flags"
}
+ proc check_effective_target_FUNC_link { } {
+ if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return [check_no_compiler_messages FUNC_link executable {
+ #if !(DEF)
+ #error "DEF failed"
+ #endif
+ #include <arm_cde.h>
+ INC
+ int
+ main (void)
+ {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ } [add_options_for_FUNC ""]]
+ }
+
proc check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib { } {
if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
return 0;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets
2023-07-07 7:51 ` [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets Christophe Lyon
@ 2023-07-10 13:45 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-07-10 13:58 ` Christophe Lyon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-07-10 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe Lyon, gcc-patches, Richard Earnshaw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 8:52 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>;
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
> Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm*
> effective-targets
>
> For arm targets, we generate many effective-targets with
> check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib and
> check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib which check if we can
> link and execute a simple program with a given set of flags/multilibs.
>
> In some cases however, it's possible to link but not to execute a
> program, so this patch adds similar _link effective-targets which only
> check if link succeeds.
>
> The patch does not uupdate the documentation as it already lacks the
> numerous existing related effective-targets.
I think this looks ok but...
>
> 2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * lib/target-supports.exp (arm_*FUNC_link): New effective-targets.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-
> supports.exp
> index c04db2be7f9..d33bc077418 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -5129,6 +5129,14 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdefs } {
> return "$flags FLAG"
> }
>
> + proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_link { } {
> + return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_arch_FUNC_link
> executable {
> + #include <stdint.h>
> + int dummy;
> + int main (void) { return 0; }
> + } [add_options_for_arm_arch_FUNC ""]]
> + }
> +
> proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib { } {
> return [check_runtime arm_arch_FUNC_multilib {
> int
> @@ -5906,6 +5914,7 @@ proc add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon {
> flags } {
> # arm_v8m_main_cde: Armv8-m CDE (Custom Datapath Extension).
> # arm_v8m_main_cde_fp: Armv8-m CDE with FP registers.
> # arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE.
> +# arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE with FP
> support.
> # Usage:
> # /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8m_main_cde_ok } */
> # /* { dg-add-options arm_v8m_main_cde } */
> @@ -5965,6 +5974,24 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdef arminc } {
> return "$flags $et_FUNC_flags"
> }
>
> + proc check_effective_target_FUNC_link { } {
> + if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return [check_no_compiler_messages FUNC_link executable {
> + #if !(DEF)
> + #error "DEF failed"
> + #endif
> + #include <arm_cde.h>
... why is arm_cde.h included here?
> + INC
> + int
> + main (void)
> + {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + } [add_options_for_FUNC ""]]
> + }
> +
> proc check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib { } {
> if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> return 0;
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp
2023-07-07 7:51 [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Christophe Lyon
2023-07-07 7:51 ` [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets Christophe Lyon
@ 2023-07-10 13:47 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2024-05-28 9:31 ` Arm branding (was: [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp) Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-07-10 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe Lyon, gcc-patches, Richard Earnshaw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 8:52 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>;
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
> Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp
>
> The arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp family of effective targets was not
> documented when it was introduced.
>
> 2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>
> gcc/
> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp): Document.
> ---
> gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> index 526020c7511..03fb2394705 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
> @@ -2190,6 +2190,12 @@ ARM target supports options to generate
> instructions from ARMv8.1-M with
> the Custom Datapath Extension (CDE) and M-Profile Vector Extension (MVE).
> Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options.
>
> +@item arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp
> +ARM target supports options to generate instructions from ARMv8.1-M
> +with the Custom Datapath Extension (CDE) and M-Profile Vector
> +Extension (MVE) with floating-point support. Some multilibs may be
> +incompatible with these options.
I know the GCC source is inconsistent on this but the proper branding these days is "ARM" -> "Arm" and "ARMv8.1-M" -> "Armv8.1-M".
Ok with those changes.
Thanks,
Kyrill
> +
> @item arm_pacbti_hw
> Test system supports executing Pointer Authentication and Branch Target
> Identification instructions.
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets
2023-07-10 13:45 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
@ 2023-07-10 13:58 ` Christophe Lyon
2023-07-10 14:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Lyon @ 2023-07-10 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Richard Earnshaw
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4003 bytes --]
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 15:46, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> > Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 8:52 AM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>;
> > Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
> > Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> > Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and
> arm*
> > effective-targets
> >
> > For arm targets, we generate many effective-targets with
> > check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib and
> > check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib which check if we can
> > link and execute a simple program with a given set of flags/multilibs.
> >
> > In some cases however, it's possible to link but not to execute a
> > program, so this patch adds similar _link effective-targets which only
> > check if link succeeds.
> >
> > The patch does not uupdate the documentation as it already lacks the
> > numerous existing related effective-targets.
>
> I think this looks ok but...
>
> >
> > 2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (arm_*FUNC_link): New effective-targets.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-
> > supports.exp
> > index c04db2be7f9..d33bc077418 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> > @@ -5129,6 +5129,14 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdefs } {
> > return "$flags FLAG"
> > }
> >
> > + proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_link { } {
> > + return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_arch_FUNC_link
> > executable {
> > + #include <stdint.h>
> > + int dummy;
> > + int main (void) { return 0; }
> > + } [add_options_for_arm_arch_FUNC ""]]
> > + }
> > +
> > proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib { } {
> > return [check_runtime arm_arch_FUNC_multilib {
> > int
> > @@ -5906,6 +5914,7 @@ proc add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon {
> > flags } {
> > # arm_v8m_main_cde: Armv8-m CDE (Custom Datapath Extension).
> > # arm_v8m_main_cde_fp: Armv8-m CDE with FP registers.
> > # arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE.
> > +# arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE with FP
> > support.
> > # Usage:
> > # /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8m_main_cde_ok } */
> > # /* { dg-add-options arm_v8m_main_cde } */
> > @@ -5965,6 +5974,24 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdef arminc } {
> > return "$flags $et_FUNC_flags"
> > }
> >
> > + proc check_effective_target_FUNC_link { } {
> > + if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return [check_no_compiler_messages FUNC_link executable {
> > + #if !(DEF)
> > + #error "DEF failed"
> > + #endif
> > + #include <arm_cde.h>
>
> ... why is arm_cde.h included here?
>
> It's the very same code as check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib below.
I think it's needed in case the toolchain's default configuration is not
able to support CDE. I believe these tests would fail if the toolchain
defaults
to -mfloat-abi=soft (the gnu/stubs-{soft|hard}.h "usual" error)
I added this chunk for consistency with the other one, it's not needed at
the moment.
Christophe
> + INC
> > + int
> > + main (void)
> > + {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + } [add_options_for_FUNC ""]]
> > + }
> > +
> > proc check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib { } {
> > if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets
2023-07-10 13:58 ` Christophe Lyon
@ 2023-07-10 14:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-07-10 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe Lyon; +Cc: gcc-patches, Richard Earnshaw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 2:59 PM
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw
> <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and
> arm* effective-targets
>
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 15:46, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com
> <mailto:Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org
> <mailto:christophe.lyon@linaro.org> >
> > Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 8:52 AM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> ;
> Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com
> <mailto:Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> >;
> > Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
> <mailto:Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> >
> > Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org
> <mailto:christophe.lyon@linaro.org> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch*
> and arm*
> > effective-targets
> >
> > For arm targets, we generate many effective-targets with
> > check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib and
> > check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib which check if we
> can
> > link and execute a simple program with a given set of
> flags/multilibs.
> >
> > In some cases however, it's possible to link but not to execute a
> > program, so this patch adds similar _link effective-targets which only
> > check if link succeeds.
> >
> > The patch does not uupdate the documentation as it already lacks
> the
> > numerous existing related effective-targets.
>
> I think this looks ok but...
>
> >
> > 2023-07-07 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org
> <mailto:christophe.lyon@linaro.org> >
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (arm_*FUNC_link): New effective-
> targets.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 27
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-
> > supports.exp
> > index c04db2be7f9..d33bc077418 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> > @@ -5129,6 +5129,14 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdefs } {
> > return "$flags FLAG"
> > }
> >
> > + proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_link { } {
> > + return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_arch_FUNC_link
> > executable {
> > + #include <stdint.h>
> > + int dummy;
> > + int main (void) { return 0; }
> > + } [add_options_for_arm_arch_FUNC ""]]
> > + }
> > +
> > proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_multilib { } {
> > return [check_runtime arm_arch_FUNC_multilib {
> > int
> > @@ -5906,6 +5914,7 @@ proc
> add_options_for_arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon {
> > flags } {
> > # arm_v8m_main_cde: Armv8-m CDE (Custom Datapath
> Extension).
> > # arm_v8m_main_cde_fp: Armv8-m CDE with FP registers.
> > # arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE.
> > +# arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp: Armv8.1-m CDE with MVE with
> FP
> > support.
> > # Usage:
> > # /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8m_main_cde_ok } */
> > # /* { dg-add-options arm_v8m_main_cde } */
> > @@ -5965,6 +5974,24 @@ foreach { armfunc armflag armdef
> arminc } {
> > return "$flags $et_FUNC_flags"
> > }
> >
> > + proc check_effective_target_FUNC_link { } {
> > + if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return [check_no_compiler_messages FUNC_link executable {
> > + #if !(DEF)
> > + #error "DEF failed"
> > + #endif
> > + #include <arm_cde.h>
>
> ... why is arm_cde.h included here?
>
>
>
> It's the very same code as check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib below.
>
> I think it's needed in case the toolchain's default configuration is not
> able to support CDE. I believe these tests would fail if the toolchain defaults
> to -mfloat-abi=soft (the gnu/stubs-{soft|hard}.h "usual" error)
>
> I added this chunk for consistency with the other one, it's not needed at the
> moment.
Ah, this is a CDE-specific region. I couldn't tell from the default diff context, but having looked at the code around it, it makes sense.
Ok.
Thanks,
Kyrill
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
>
> > + INC
> > + int
> > + main (void)
> > + {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + } [add_options_for_FUNC ""]]
> > + }
> > +
> > proc check_effective_target_FUNC_multilib { } {
> > if { ! [check_effective_target_FUNC_ok] } {
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Arm branding (was: [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp)
2023-07-10 13:47 ` [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Kyrylo Tkachov
@ 2024-05-28 9:31 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2024-05-28 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: Christophe Lyon, gcc-patches, Richard Earnshaw
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I know the GCC source is inconsistent on this but the proper branding
> these days is "ARM" -> "Arm" and "ARMv8.1-M" -> "Armv8.1-M".
Arm, Red Hat, and SUSE - those three are spelt incorrectly by third
parties more often than not, it seems. :-(
Is it always Arm now in every context and meaning (outside target
triplets)?
If so, I'll add a line to our table in codingconventions.html?
If not, can you explain the specifics?
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-28 9:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-07 7:51 [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Christophe Lyon
2023-07-07 7:51 ` [PATCH] testsuite: Add _link flavor for several arm_arch* and arm* effective-targets Christophe Lyon
2023-07-10 13:45 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-07-10 13:58 ` Christophe Lyon
2023-07-10 14:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-07-10 13:47 ` [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp Kyrylo Tkachov
2024-05-28 9:31 ` Arm branding (was: [PATCH] doc: Document arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp) Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).