From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: josmyers@redhat.com, richard.guenther@gmail.com, uecker@tugraz.at
Cc: siddhesh@gotplt.org, keescook@chromium.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v1 3/4] Add testing cases for flexible array members in unions and alone in structures.
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:43:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419184317.2138890-4-qing.zhao@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419184317.2138890-1-qing.zhao@oracle.com>
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2a532d77c1dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* testing the correct usage of flexible array members in unions
+ and alone in structure. */
+/* { dg-do run} */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -Wpedantic" } */
+
+union with_fam_1 {
+ int a;
+ int b[]; /* { dg-warning "flexible array member in union is a GCC extension" } */
+};
+
+union with_fam_2 {
+ char a;
+ int b[]; /* { dg-warning "flexible array member in union is a GCC extension" } */
+};
+
+union with_fam_3 {
+ char a[]; /* { dg-warning " flexible array member in union is a GCC extension" } */
+ int b[]; /* { dg-warning "flexible array member in union is a GCC extension" } */
+};
+
+struct only_fam {
+ int b[]; /* { dg-warning "flexible array member in a struct with no named members is a GCC extension" } */
+};
+
+int main ()
+{
+ if (sizeof (union with_fam_1) != sizeof (int))
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (sizeof (union with_fam_2) != __alignof__ (int))
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (sizeof (union with_fam_3) != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (sizeof (struct only_fam) != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ return 0;
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..130124bbe653
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-in-union-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* testing the correct usage of flexible array members in unions
+ and alone in structure: initialization */
+/* { dg-do run} */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+union with_fam_1 {
+ int a;
+ int b[];
+} with_fam_1_v = {.b = {1, 2, 3, 4}};
+
+union with_fam_2 {
+ int a;
+ char b[];
+} with_fam_2_v = {.a = 0x1f2f3f4f};
+
+union with_fam_3 {
+ char a[];
+ int b[];
+} with_fam_3_v = {.b = {0x1f2f3f4f, 0x5f6f7f7f}};
+
+struct only_fam {
+ int b[];
+} only_fam_v = {{7, 11}};
+
+int main ()
+{
+ if (with_fam_1_v.b[3] != 4
+ || with_fam_1_v.b[0] != 1)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (with_fam_2_v.b[3] != 0x1f
+ || with_fam_2_v.b[0] != 0x4f)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (with_fam_3_v.a[0] != 0x4f
+ || with_fam_3_v.a[7] != 0x5f)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ if (only_fam_v.b[0] != 7
+ || only_fam_v.b[1] != 11)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 18:43 [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in unions and alone in structures [PR53548] Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 20:54 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-22 13:28 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 18:04 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 18:21 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 19:03 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:21 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 2/4] C and C++ FE changes to support flexible array members in unions and alone in structures Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 19:51 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:58 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2024-04-23 18:53 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 3/4] Add testing cases for " Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:30 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 4/4] Adjust testcases for flexible array member in union and alone in structure extension Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 21:55 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in unions and alone in structures [PR53548] Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240419184317.2138890-4-qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).